ESE

Publications

Empirical Software Engineering Research Group Publications
[Photo: Universität Stuttgart]

  1. 2021

    1. Yu, J., Wagner, S., & Luo, F. (2021). Data-flow-based adaption of the System-Theoretic Process Analysis for Security (STPA). PeerJ Computer Science, 7(e362), Article e362. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.362
    2. Wyrich, M., Preikschat, A., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2021). The Mind Is a Powerful Place: How Showing Code Comprehensibility Metrics Influences Code Understanding. In A. van Deursen & T. Xie (Eds.), 43rd International Conference of Software Engineering (ICSE 2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09590
    3. Tennant, J., Agarwal, R., Baždarić, K., Brassard, D., Crick, T., Dunleavy, D. J., Evans, T. R., Gardner, N., Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Graziotin, D., & others. (2021). A tale of two ‘opens’: intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship (TBA, Ed.). SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2kxq8
    4. Shihab, E., Wagner, S., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021). Summary of the 2nd International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE 2020). ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 46(1), 20–22.
    5. Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., Gren, L., Tengberg, L. G., Tidefors, I., & Graziotin, D. (2021). Qualitative software engineering research--reflections and guidelines. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1712.08341. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.08341
    6. Graziotin, D., Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., & Wagner, S. (2021). Behavioral Software Engineering: Methodological Introduction to Psychometrics. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2005.09959. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.09959
  2. 2020

    1. Yu, J., Wagner, S., & Luo, F. (2020). A STPA-based Approach for Systematic Security Analysis of In-vehicle Diagnostic and Software Update Systems. FISITA Web Congress 2020. https://www.fisita.com/events/web-congress/2020/agenda
    2. Wyrich, M., Hebig, R., Wagner, S., & Scandariato, R. (2020). Perception and Acceptance of an Autonomous Refactoring Bot. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009168803030310
    3. Wagner, S., Mendez, D., Felderer, M., Graziotin, D., & Kalinowski, M. (2020). Challenges in Survey Research. In F. M. & T. G. (Eds.), Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering (pp. 93–125). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32489-6_4
    4. Wagner, S. (2020). Optimising Analytical Software Quality Assurance. International Conference on Software Quality (SWQD 2020), 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35510-4_9
    5. Spiegler, S. V., Graziotin, D., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2020). A Quantitative Exploration of the 9-Factor Theory: Distribution of Leadership Roles Between Scrum Master and Agile Team. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Agile Software Development (XP 2020), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49392-9_11
    6. Ralph, P., Baltes, S., Bianculli, D., Dittrich, Y., Felderer, M., Feldt, R., Filieri, A., Furia, C. A., Graziotin, D., He, P., & others. (2020). ACM SIGSOFT empirical standards. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2010.03525. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03525
    7. Prechelt, L., Graziotin, D., & Mendez, D. (2020). Double-blind is good but open would be better: Perceptions of peer review in the SE community. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 45(3), 16–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402127.3402133
    8. Polian, I., Anders, J., Becker, S., Bernardi, P., Chakrabarty, K., ElHamawy, N., Sauer, M., Singh, A., Reorda, M. S., & Wagner, S. (2020). Exploring the Mysteries of System-Level Test. 2020 IEEE 29th Asian Test Symposium (ATS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS49688.2020.9301557
    9. Ostberg, J.-P., Graziotin, D., Wagner, S., & Derntl, B. (2020). A methodology for psycho-biological assessment of stress in software engineering. PeerJ Computer Science, 6, e286. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.286
    10. Ortu, M., Destefanis, G., Graziotin, D., Marchesi, M., & Tonelli, R. (2020). How do you Propose Your Code Changes? Empirical Analysis of Affect Metrics of Pull Requests on GitHub. IEEE Access, 8, 110897–110907. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3002663
    11. Niedermayr, R., Röhm, T., & Wagner, S. (2020). Too trivial to test? An inverse view on defect prediction to identify methods with low fault risk. Software Engineering 2020, 137–138. https://doi.org/10.18420/SE2020_41
    12. Niedermaier, S., Heisse, S., & Wagner, S. (2020). Correct and Control Complex IoT Systems: Evaluation of a Classification for System Anomalies. 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00050
    13. Mindermann, K., & Wagner, S. (2020). Fluid intelligence doesn’t matter!: effects of code examples on the usability of crypto APIs. ICSE ’20: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, 306–607. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377812.3390892
    14. Mendez, D., Graziotin, D., Wagner, S., & Seibold, H. (2020). Open Science in Software Engineering. In F. M. & T. G. (Eds.), Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering (pp. 477–501). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32489-6_17
    15. Matias, T., Correia, F. F., Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Ferreira, H. S., & Restivo, A. (2020). Determining Microservice Boundaries: A Case Study Using Static and Dynamic Software Analysis. In A. Jansen, I. Malavolta, H. Muccini, I. Ozkaya, & O. Zimmermann (Eds.), Software Architecture. ECSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 12292, pp. 315--332). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58923-3_21
    16. Krusche, S., & Wagner, S. (2020). Software Engineering im Unterricht der Hochschulen 2020. Software Engineering 2020, 239–240. https://doi.org/10.18420/SE2020_65
    17. Tagungsband des 17. Workshops “Software Engineering im Unterricht der Hochschulen” 2020, Innsbruck, Österreich, 26. - 27.02.2020. (2020). In S. Krusche & S. Wagner (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2531). CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2531/
    18. Justus, B., Stefan, W., & Alfred, Z. (2020). Collecting Service-Based Maintainability Metrics from RESTful API Descriptions: Static Analysis and Threshold Derivation. Software Architecture. ECSA 2020., 1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59155-7_16
    19. Franco da Silva, A. C., & Hirmer, P. (2020). Models for Internet of Things Environments—A Survey. Information, 11(10), Article 10.
    20. Bogner, J., Weller, A., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). Exploring Maintainability Assurance Research for Service- and Microservice-Based Systems: Directions and Differences. In L. Cruz-Filipe, S. Giallorenzo, F. Montesi, M. Peressotti, F. Rademacher, & S. Sachweh (Eds.), Joint Post-proceedings of the First and Second International Conference on Microservices (Microservices2017/2019) (Vol. 78, pp. 3:1--3:22). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.Microservices.2017-2019.3
    21. Bogner, J. (2020). On the Evolvability Assurance of Microservices: Metrics, Scenarios, and Patterns [Doctoral thesis (Dr. rer. nat. / PhD), University of Stuttgart, Germany]. https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/10967
    22. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). Scenario-based Evolvability Analysis of Service-oriented Systems: A Lightweight and Tool-supported Method. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, 204--215. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009463902040215
    23. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). Collecting Service-Based Maintainability Metrics from RESTful API Descriptions: Static Analysis and Threshold Derivation. In Software Architecture. ECSA 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS) (pp. 215--227). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59155-7_16
    24. Barón, M. M., Wyrich, M., & Wagner, S. (2020). An Empirical Validation of Cognitive Complexity as a Measure of Source Code Understandability. Proceedings of the 14th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3382494.3410636
  3. 2019

    1. Wyrich, M., & Bogner, J. (2019). Towards an Autonomous Bot for Automatic Source Code Refactoring. 2019 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE), 24--28. https://doi.org/10.1109/BotSE.2019.00015
    2. Wyrich, M., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). A theory on individual characteristics of successful coding challenge solvers. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e173. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.173
    3. Wang, Y., Graziotin, D., Kriso, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). Communication channels in safety analysis: An industrial exploratory case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 153, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.004
    4. Wagner, S., Fernández, D. M., Felderer, M., Vetrò, A., Kalinowski, M., Wieringa, R. J., Pfahl, D., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.-T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayebi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., … Winkler, D. (2019). Status Quo in Requirements Engineering: A Theory and a Global Family of Surveys. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 28(2), 9:1-9:48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306607
    5. Wagner, S., & Murphy-Hill, E. R. (2019). Factors That Influence Productivity: A Checklist. In C. Sadowski & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 69–84). Apress open / Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/collections/SZ2019.html#WagnerM19
    6. Wagner, S., & Deissenboeck, F. (2019). Defining Productivity in Software Engineering. In C. Sadowski & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 29–38). Apress open / Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/collections/SZ2019.html#0001D19
    7. Tennant, J. P., Penders, B., Ross-Hellauer, T., others, Graziotin, D., & others. (2019). Boon, bias or bane? The potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decision-making. European Science Editing, 45(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.20316/ese.2019.45.18013
    8. Tennant, J., Beamer, J., Bosman, J., others, Graziotin, D., & others. (2019). Foundations for open scholarship strategy development. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p
    9. Spiegler, S. V., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2019). Leadership Gap in Agile Teams: How Teams and Scrum Masters Mature. In P. Kruchten, S. Fraser, & F. Coallier (Eds.), XP (Vol. 355, pp. 37–52). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/xpu/xp2019.html#SpieglerH019
    10. Spiegler, S. V., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2019). The Influence of Culture and Structure on Autonomous Teams in Established Companies. In R. Hoda (Ed.), XP Workshops (Vol. 364, pp. 46–54). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/xpu/xp2019w.html#SpieglerH019a
    11. Shihab, E., & Wagner, S. (Eds.). (2019). Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering, BotSE@ICSE 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 28, 2019. IEEE / ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/botse2019.html
    12. Roehm, T., Veihelmann, D., Wagner, S., & Jürgens, E. (2019). Evaluating Maintainability Prejudices with a Large-Scale Study of Open-Source Projects. In D. Winkler, S. Biffl, & J. Bergsmann (Eds.), SWQD (Vol. 338, pp. 151–171). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/swqd/swqd2019.html#RoehmV0J19
    13. Niedermayr, R., Röhm, T., & Wagner, S. (2019). Too trivial to test? An inverse view on defect prediction to identify methods with low fault risk. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e187. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.187
    14. Niedermayr, R., & Wagner, S. (2019). Is the Stack Distance Between Test Case and Method Correlated with Test Effectiveness? In S. Ali & V. Garousi (Eds.), EASE ’19: Proceedings of the Evaluation and Assessment on Software Engineering (pp. 189–198). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319008.3319021
    15. Niedermaier, S., Koetter, F., Freymann, A., & Wagner, S. (2019). On Observability and Monitoring of Distributed Systems - An Industry Interview Study. Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC 2019, 11895. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33702-5_3
    16. Murphy-Hill, E. R., & Wagner, S. (2019). Software Productivity Through the Lens of Knowledge Work. In C. Sadowski & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 57–65). Apress open / Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/collections/SZ2019.html#Murphy-Hill019
    17. Mindermann, K., & Wagner, S. (2019). Towards a central, distributed and secure default cryptography parameter set. Crypto Day Matters 30. https://doi.org/10.18420/cdm-2019-30-25
    18. Marner, K., Theobald, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). Release Planning in a Hybrid Project Environment. Advances in Agile and User-Centred Software Engineering. LASD 2019, MIDI 2019, 376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37534-8_2
    19. Marner, K., Theobald, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). Real-Life Challenges in Automotive Release Planning. In M. Ganzha, L. A. Maciaszek, & M. Paprzycki (Eds.), FedCSIS (pp. 831–839). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/fedcsis/fedcsis2019.html#MarnerT019
    20. Koetter, F., Blohm, M., Drawehn, J., Kochanowski, M., Goetzer, J., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). Conversational Agents for Insurance Companies: From Theory to Practice. In H. J. van den Herik, A. P. Rocha, & L. Steels (Eds.), ICAART (Revised Selected Papers) (Vol. 11978, pp. 338–362). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icaart/icaart2019s.html#KoetterBDKGG019
    21. Koetter, F., Blohm, M., Kochanowski, M., Goetzer, J., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). Motivations, Classification and Model Trial of Conversational Agents for Insurance Companies. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007252100190030
    22. Koetter, F., Blohm, M., Drawehn, J., Kochanowski, M., Goetzer, J., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). Conversational Agents for Insurance Companies: From Theory to Practice International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence. International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2019), 338–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_17
    23. Koetter, F., Kochanowski, M., Kintz, M., Kersjes, B., Bogicevic, I., & Wagner, S. (2019). Assessing Software Quality of Agile Student Projects by Data-mining Software Repositories. In H. Lane, S. Zvacek, & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), CSEDU (2) (pp. 244–251). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007688602440251
    24. Hellhake, D., Schmid, T., & Wagner, S. (2019). Using Data Flow-Based Coverage Criteria for Black-Box Integration Testing of Distributed Software Systems. ICST, 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2019.00051
    25. Graziotin, D., & Fagerholm, F. (2019). Happiness and the Productivity of Software Engineers. In Z. T. Sadowski C (Ed.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 109–124). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4221-6_10
    26. Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Microservices in the German Industry: Insights into Technologies, Characteristics, and Software Quality. 2nd International Conference on Microservices. https://www.conf-micro.services/2019/papers/Microservices\_2019\_paper\_25.pdf
    27. Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Zimmermann, A., & Wagner, S. (2019). From Monolith to Microservices: A Classification of Refactoring Approaches. In J.-M. Bruel, M. Mazzara, & B. Meyer (Eds.), Software Engineering Aspects of Continuous Development and New Paradigms of Software Production and Deployment (pp. 128--141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06019-0_10
    28. Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Microservices Migration in Industry: Intentions, Strategies, and Challenges. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00081
    29. Fernández, D. M., Franch, X., Seyff, N., Felderer, M., Glinz, M., Kalinowski, M., Vogelsang, A., Wagner, S., Bühne, S., & Lauenroth, K. (2019). Do We Preach What We Practice? Investigating the Practical Relevance of Requirements Engineering Syllabi - The IREB Case. CoRR, abs/1902.01822. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1902.html#abs-1902-01822
    30. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). On the impact of service-oriented patterns on software evolvability: a controlled experiment and metric-based analysis. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e213. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.213
    31. Bogner, J., Schlinger, S., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). A Modular Approach to Calculate Service-Based Maintainability Metrics from Runtime Data of Microservices. In X. Franch, T. Männistö, & S. Martínez-Fernández (Eds.), 20th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES’19) (Vol. 11915, pp. 489–496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_34
    32. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Microservices in Industry: Insights into Technologies, Characteristics, and Software Quality. ICSA Companion, 187–195. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icsa/icsa2019c.html#BognerF0Z19
    33. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Assuring the Evolvability of Microservices: Insights into Industry Practices and Challenges. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00089
    34. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Using architectural modifiability tactics to examine evolution qualities of Service- and Microservice-Based Systems. SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems, 34(2–3), 141--149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-019-00402-z
    35. Bogner, J., Boceck, T., Popp, M., Tschechlov, D., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Towards a Collaborative Repository for the Documentation of Service-Based Antipatterns and Bad Smells. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), 95--101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00025
    36. Becker, S., Bogicevic, I., Herzwurm, G., & Wagner, S. (Eds.). (2019). Software Engineering and Software Management, SE/SWM 2019, Stuttgart, Germany, February 18-22, 2019. P-292. https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/21116
    37. Avezum, M., Seitz, A., Wagner, S., & Bruegge, B. (2019). Interdisciplinary System Courses - Teaching Agile Systems Engineering. In S. Krusche, K. Schneider, M. Kuhrmann, R. Heinrich, R. Jung, M. Konersmann, E. Schmieders, S. Helke, I. Schaefer, A. Vogelsang, B. Annighöfer, A. Schweiger, M. Reich, & A. van Hoorn (Eds.), Software Engineering (Workshops) (Vol. 2308, pp. 11–18). CEUR-WS.org. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2019w.html#AvezumSWB19
  4. 2018

    1. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2018). Combining STPA and BDD for Safety Analysis and Verification in Agile Development: A Controlled Experiment. XP 2018: Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, 314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_3
    2. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2018). Combining STPA and BDD for safety analysis and verification in agile development. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings (ICSE ’18), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3194973
    3. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2018). On groupthink in safety analysis: an industrial case study. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP ’18), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183519.3183538
    4. Wagner, S., Tichy, M., Felderer, M., & Leue, S. (2018). Verlässliche Software im 21. Jahrhundert. Informatik-Spektrum, 41(5), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-018-1118-x
    5. Wagner, S., Fernández, D. M., Kalinowski, M., & Felderer, M. (2018). Agile Requirements Engineering in Practice: Status Quo and Critical Problems. CLEI Electron. J., 21(1), Article 1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/cleiej/cleiej21.html#0001FKF18
    6. Software Engineering und Software Management 2018, Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, SE 2018, 5.-9. März 2018, Ulm, Germany. (2018). In M. Tichy, E. Bodden, M. Kuhrmann, S. Wagner, & J.-P. Steghöfer (Eds.), LNI: Vol. P-279. Gesellschaft für Informatik. https://doi.org/978-3-88579-673-2
    7. Stach, C. S., Alpers, S., Betz, S., Dürr, F., Fritsch, A., Mindermann, K., Murthy Palanisamy, S., Schiefer, G., Wagner, M., Mitschang, B., Oberweis, A., & Wagner, S. (2018). The AVARE PATRON - A Holistic Privacy Approach for the Internet of Things. In P. Samarati & M. S. Obaidat (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications: Vol. 1: SECRYPT. Scitepress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006850305380545
    8. Prechelt, L., Graziotin, D., & Fernández, D. M. (2018). A community’s perspective on the status and future of peer review in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 95, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.019
    9. Pano, A., Graziotin, D., & Abrahamsson, P. (2018). Factors and actors leading to the adoption of a JavaScript framework. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(6), 3503–3534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9613-x
    10. Niedermayr, R., Röhm, T., & Wagner, S. (2018). Identification of methods with low fault risk. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings (ICSE ’18), 390–391. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3195022
    11. Mäntylä, M. V., Graziotin, D., & Kuutila, M. (2018). The evolution of sentiment analysis—A review of research topics, venues, and top cited papers. Computer Science Review, 27, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.10.002
    12. Mindermann, K., Keck, P., & Wagner, S. (2018). How Usable are Rust Cryptography APIs? Proceedings of the International Conference Software on Quality, Reliability, and Security. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04929
    13. Mindermann, K., & Wagner, S. (2018). Usability and Security Effects of Code Examples on Crypto APIs - CryptoExamples: A platform for free, minimal, complete and secure crypto examples. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01095
    14. Mendez, D., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Mafra, P., Vetro, A., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.-T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayebi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Pfahl, D., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., … Wieringa, R. (2018). NaPiRE Data Set 2014. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5845083.v1
    15. Mendez, D., & Wagner, S. (2018). NaPiRE Data Set 2013. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5844789.v1
    16. Käfer, V., Graziotin, D., Bogicevic, I., Wagner, S., & Ramadani, J. (2018). Communication in open-source projects-end of the e-mail era? Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings, 242–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3194951
    17. Käfer, V., Graziotin, D., Bogicevic, I., Wagner, S., & Ramadani, J. (2018). Communication in Open-source Projects-end of the e-Mail Era? Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings, 242--243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3194951
    18. Käfer, V., Wagner, S., & Koschke, R. (2018). Are there functionally similar code clones in practice? 2018 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Software Clones (IWSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSC.2018.8327312
    19. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2018). Spreadsheet guardian: An approach to protecting semantic correctness throughout the evolution of spreadsheets (journal-first abstract). 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330242
    20. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2018). Spreadsheet guardian: An approach to protecting semantic correctness throughout the evolution of spreadsheets. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1934
    21. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2018). Spreadsheet Guardian: An Approach for Protecting Semantic Correctness throughout the Evolution of Spreadsheets. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1934
    22. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2018). What happens when software developers are (un)happy. Journal of Systems and Software, 140, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.041
    23. Bogner, J., Zimmermann, A., & Wagner, S. (2018). Analyzing the Relevance of SOA Patterns for Microservice-Based Systems. Proceedings of the 10th Central European Workshop on Services and Their Composition (ZEUS’18), 9--16. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2072/paper2.pdf
    24. Bogner, J. (2018). Towards an Evolvability Assurance Method for Service-Based Systems. PhD Symposium of the 7th European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing (ESOCC’18).
    25. Bogner, J., Choudhary, B., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2018). Towards a Generalizable Comparison of the Maintainability of Object-Oriented and Service-Oriented Applications. Workshop Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing (ESOCC’18), 1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63161-1_9
    26. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2018). Limiting Technical Debt with Maintainability Assurance: An Industry Survey on Used Techniques and Differences with Service- and Microservice-Based Systems. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Technical Debt - TechDebt ’18, 125--133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194164.3194166
    27. Abdulkhaleq, A., Baumeister, M., Böhmert, H., & Wagner, S. (2018). Missing no Interaction – Using STPA for Identifying Hazardous Interactions of Automated Driving Systems. International Journal of Safety Science, 2(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.24900/ijss/0201115124.2018.0301
  5. 2017

    1. Wyrich, M., Bogicevic, I., & Wagner, S. (2017). Improving Communication in Scrum Teams. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2017, 10611, 602–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_50
    2. Wang, Y., Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). An Exploratory Study on Applying a Scrum Development Process for Safety-Critical Systems. PROFES 2017: Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 10611, 324–340.
    3. Wang, Y., Bogicevic, I., & Wagner, S. (2017). A study of safety documentation in a Scrum development process. XP Workshops 2017.
    4. Wagner, S., Méndez Fernández, D., Felderer, M., & Kalinowski, M. (2017). Requirements Engineering Practice and Problems in Agile Projects: Results from an International Survey. Proceedings of the XX Iberoamerican Conference on Software Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, 389–402.
    5. Tennant, J., Dugan, J., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., Elkhatib, Y., B Collister, L., Pikas, C., Crick, T., Masuzzo, P., Caravaggi, A., Berg, D., Niemeyer, K., Ross-Hellauer, T., Mannheimer, S., Rigling, L., Katz, D., Greshake Tzovaras, B., … Colomb, J. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Res, 6, 1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
    6. Tennant, J., Graziotin, D., & Kearns, S. (2017). We have the technology to save peer review-now it is up to our communities to implement it. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/09/11/we-have-the-technology-to-save-peer-review-now-it-is-up-to-our-communities-to-implement-it/
    7. Stach, C., Dürr, F., Mindermann, K., Murthy Palanisamy, S., Tariq, M. A., Mitschang, B., & Wagner, S. (2017). PATRON - Datenschutz in Datenstromverarbeitungssystemen. GI-Jahrestagung 2017.
    8. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). How Do Coupled File Changes Influence How Developers Seek Help During Maintenance Tasks? 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2017.50
    9. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). Are suggestions from coupled file changes useful for perfective maintenance tasks? PeerJ Computer Science, 3(e135), Article e135. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.135
    10. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). Mining Java Packages for Developer Profiles: An Exploratory Study. In B. Mitschang, N. Ritter, H. Schwarz, M. Klettke, A. Thor, O. Kopp, & M. Wieland (Eds.), Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web (BTW 2017) - Workshopband: Vol. P-266. Gesellschaft für Informatik.
    11. Ostberg, J.-P., Graziotin, D., Wagner, S., & Derntl, B. (2017). Towards the Assessment of Stress and Emotional Responses of a Salutogenesis-Enhanced Software Tool Using Psychophysiological Measurements. 2017 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/semotion.2017.4
    12. Moretti, M., Gobbato, F., Trevisiol, S., Seta, G., Graziotin, D., Corrent, C., De Luca, M., & Orlandi, S. (2017). People’s Republic of Bolzano. Sciences Du Design, n° 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.005.0018
    13. Mindermann, K., Riedel, F., Abdulkhaleq, A., Stach, C., & Wagner, S. (2017). Exploratory Study of the Privacy Extension for System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA-Priv) to Elicit Privacy Risks in eHealth. 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2017.30
    14. Käfer, V., Kulesz, D., & Wagner, S. (2017). What Is the Best Way For Developers to Learn New Software Tools? An Empirical Comparison Between a Text and a Video Tutorial. Programming Journal, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2017/1/17
    15. Käfer, V. (2017). Summarizing Software Engineering Communication Artifacts from Different Sources. Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, 1038--1041. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106237.3119877
    16. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2017). How Spreadsheet Users Maintain Unknown Spreadsheets. Proc. 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering Methods in Spreadsheets (SEMS’17).
    17. Karimi Dehkordi, Z., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2017). Links between the personalities, styles and performance in computer programming. In J. Jürjens & K. Schneider (Eds.), Software Engineering 2017: Vol. P-267. Gesellschaft für Informatik. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2017.html#KarimiBG017
    18. Kalinowski, M., Curty, P., Paes, A., Ferreira, A., Sp, Fernández, D. M., Felderer, M., & Wagner, S. (2017). Supporting Defect Causal Analysis in Practice with Cross-company Data on Causes of Requirements Engineering Problems. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track, 223--232. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.14
    19. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017). Unhappy Developers: Bad for Themselves, Bad for Process, and Bad for Software Product. 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C), 362–364. https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-c.2017.104
    20. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017). On the Unhappiness of Software Developers. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084242
    21. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017). Consequences of Unhappiness while Developing Software. 2017 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/semotion.2017.5
    22. Femmer, H., Mendez Fernandez, D., Wagner, S., & Eder, S. (2017). Rapid Quality Assurance with Requirements Smells. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.047
    23. Femmer, H., Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., & Eder, S. (2017). Rapid quality assurance with Requirements Smells. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.047
    24. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Towards a practical maintainability quality model for service-and microservice-based systems. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Architecture Companion Proceedings - ECSA ’17, 3, 195--198. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129790.3129816
    25. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Automatically measuring the maintainability of service- and microservice-based systems. Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 12th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement on - IWSM Mensura ’17, 107--115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143434.3143443
    26. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Automatically measuring the maintainability of service- and microservice-based systems: a literature review. Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 12th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement on - IWSM Mensura ’17, 107--115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143434.3143443
    27. Abdulkhaleq, A., Wagner, S., Lammering, D., Boehmert, H., & Blueher, P. (2017). Using STPA in Compliance with ISO 26262 for Developing a Safe Architecture for Fully Automated Vehicles. Proc. Automotive - Safety & Security 2017.
  6. 2016

    1. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2016). Towards applying a safety analysis and verification method based on STPA to agile software development. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery, CSED@ICSE 2016, 5–11. https://doi.org/doi:10.1145/2896941.2896948
    2. Wagner, S. (2016). Natural language processing is no free lunch. In T. Menzies, L. Williams, & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Perspectives on Data Science for Software Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804206-9.00033-7
    3. Wagner, S., Abdulkhaleq, A., Bogicevic, I., Ostberg, J.-P., & Ramadani, J. (2016). How are functionally similar code clones syntactically different? An empirical study and a benchmark. PeerJ Computer Science, 2:e49. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.49
    4. Wagner, S., Abdulkhaleq, A., Kaya, K., & Paar, A. (2016). On the Relationship of Inconsistent Software Clones and Faults: An Empirical Study. IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, SANER 2016, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2016.94
    5. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2016). Which Change Sets in Git Repositories Are Related? 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security, QRS 2016, 406–411. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/qrs/qrs2016.html#Ramadani016
    6. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2016). Are Suggestions of Coupled File Changes Interesting? In L. A. Maciaszek & J. Filipe (Eds.), ENASE (pp. 15–26). SciTePress. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/enase/enase2016.html#Ramadani016
    7. Pflüger, D., Mehl, M., Valentin, J., Lindner, F., Pfander, D., Wagner, S., Graziotin, D., & Wang, Y. (2016). The scalability-efficiency/maintainability-portability trade-off in simulation software engineering: Examples and a preliminary systematic literature review. 2016 Fourth International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering (SE-HPCCSE), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/SE-HPCCSE.2016.008
    8. Pfluger, D., Mehl, M., Valentin, J., Lindner, F., Pfander, D., Wagner, S., Graziotin, D., & Wang, Y. (2016). The Scalability-Efficiency/Maintainability-Portability Trade-Off in Simulation Software Engineering: Examples and a Preliminary Systematic Literature Review. 2016 Fourth International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering (SE-HPCCSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/se-hpccse.2016.008
    9. Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2016). At Ease with Your Warnings: The Principles of the Salutogenesis Model Applied to Automatic Static Analysis. IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, SANER 2016, 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2016.63
    10. Ostberg, J.-P., Wagner, S., & Weilemann, E. (2016). Does personality influence the usage of static analysis tools?: an explorative experiment. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE@ICSE 2016, 75–81. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/chase2016.html#Ostberg0W16
    11. Niedermayr, R., Jürgens, E., & Wagner, S. (2016). Will my tests tell me if I break this code? Proceedings of the International Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery, CSED@ICSE 2016, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896941.2896944
    12. Méndez Fernández, D., & Wagner, S. (2016). Case studies in industry: what we have learnt. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry, CESI@ICSE 2016, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896839.2896844
    13. Mäntylä, M., Adams, B., Destefanis, G., Graziotin, D., & Ortu, M. (2016). Mining valence, arousal, and dominance: possibilities for detecting burnout and productivity? Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2016), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2901752
    14. Mindermann, K. (2016). Are easily usable security libraries possible and how should experts work together to create them? Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897610
    15. Mindermann, K., Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2016). Assessing Iterative Practical Software Engineering Courses with Play Money. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, 754--755. https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2892660
    16. Mafra, P., Kalinowski, M., Fernández, D. M., Felderer, M., & Wagner, S. (2016). Towards Guidelines for Preventing Critical Requirements Engineering Problems. 42th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2016, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2016.50
    17. Käfer, V., Kulesz, D., & Wagner, S. (2016). What Is the Best Way For Developers to Learn New Software Tools? An Empirical Comparison Between a Text and a Video Tutorial. Programming Journal, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2017/1/17
    18. Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Conte, T., Spínola, R. O., Prikladnicki, R., Winkler, D., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2016). Preventing Incomplete/Hidden Requirements: Reflections on Survey Data from Austria and Brazil. In D. Winkler, S. Biffl, & J. Bergsmann (Eds.), Software Quality. The Future of Systems- and Software Development, 8th International Conference, SWQD 2016 (Vol. 238, pp. 63–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27033-3_5
    19. Graziotin, D. (2016). Software quality information needs. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2, e8865. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8865
    20. Graziotin, D. (2016). Towards a theory of affect and software developers’ performance. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1601.05330.
    21. Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Mafra, P., Vetrò, A., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.-T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayabi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Pfahl, D., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., … Wieringa, R. (2016). Naming the pain in requirements engineering: Contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empirical Software Engineering, 1--41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9451-7
    22. Dehkordi, Z. K., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2016). Links between the personalities, styles and performance in computer programming. Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.011
    23. Baltes, S., & Wagner, S. (2016). Empirical Research Plan: Effects of Sketching on Program Comprehension. In H. Sharp & T. Hall (Eds.), XP (Vol. 251, pp. 281–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_26
  7. 2015

    1. Wagner, S., Goeb, A., Heinemann, L., Kläs, M., Lampasona, C., Lochmann, K., Mayr, A., Plösch, R., Seidl, A., Streit, J., & Trendowicz, A. (2015). Operationalised product quality models and assessment: The Quamoco approach. Information & Software Technology, 62, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.009
    2. Wagner, S. (2015). Continuous and Focused Developer Feedback on Software Quality (CoFoDeF). Research Ideas and Outcomes, 1, e7576. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7576
    3. Wagner, S., & Méndez Fernández, D. (2015). Analyzing text in software projects. In C. Bird, T. Menzies, & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), The art and science of analyzing software data. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411519-4.00003-3
    4. Wagner, S., Pflüger, D., & Mehl, M. (2015). Simulation software engineering: experiences and challenges. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering, SE-HPCCSE@SC 2015, 1–4. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/sc/sehpccse2015.html#WagnerPM15
    5. Vetro, A., Ognawala, S., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). Fast feedback cycles in empirical software engineering research. In A. Bertolino, G. Canfora, & S. G. Elbaum (Eds.), 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2015) (pp. 583–586). IEEE Computer Society. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2015-2.html#VetroOF015
    6. Kalinowski, M., Spínola, R. O., Conte, T., Prikladnicki, R., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). Towards building knowledge on causes of critical requirements engineering problems. In H. Xu (Ed.), Proceedings, SEKE 2015, the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (pp. 1–6). KSI Research Inc. and Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/seke/seke2015.html#KalinowskiSCPF015
    7. Janke, E., Brune, P., & Wagner, S. (2015). Does outside-in teaching improve the learning of object-oriented programming? In A. Bertolino, G. Canfora, & S. G. Elbaum (Eds.), 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 408–417). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2015.173
    8. Getir, S., Grunske, L., Bernasko, C. K., Käfer, V., Sanwald, T., & Tichy, M. (2015). CoWolf - a generic framework for multi-view co-evolution and evaluation of models. In D. S. Kolovos & M. Wimmer (Eds.), Theory and practice of model transformations (Vol. 9152, pp. 34–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21155-8_3
    9. Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). A Case Study on Artefact-Based RE Improvement in Practice. In P. Abrahamsson, L. Corral, M. Oivo, & B. Russo (Eds.), Product-focused software process improvement (Vol. 9459, pp. 114–130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_9
    10. Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). Naming the pain in requirements engineering: A design for a global family of surveys and first results from Germany. Information & Software Technology, 57, 616–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.05.008
    11. Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Schekelmann, A., Tuzcu, A., Conte, T., Spinola, R., & Prikladnicki, R. (2015). Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering: Comparing Practices in Brazil and Germany. IEEE Software, 32(5), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.122
    12. Diebold, P., Ostberg, J.-P., Wagner, S., & Zendler, U. (2015). What Do Practitioners Vary in Using Scrum? In C. Lassenius, T. Dingsøyr, & M. Paasivaara (Eds.), Agile processes, in software engineering, and extreme programming (Vol. 212, pp. 40–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_4
    13. Dehkordi, Z. K., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2015). Influence of personality on programming styles an empirical study. Journal of Information Technology Research, 8(4), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2015100103
    14. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2015). Integrated Safety Analysis Using Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis and Software Model Checking. In F. Koornneef & C. van Gulijk (Eds.), Computer safety, reliability, and security : 34th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2015 (Vol. 9337, pp. 121–134). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/safecomp/safecomp2015.html#Abdulkhaleq015
    15. Abdulkhaleq, A., Wagner, S., & Leveson, N. (2015). A comprehensive safety engineering approach for software-intensive systems based on STPA. Procedia Engineering, abs/1612.03109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.498
    16. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2015). A controlled experiment for the empirical evaluation of safety analysis techniques for safety-critical software. In J. Lv, H. J. Zhang, & M. A. Babar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (pp. 16:1-16:10). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745802.2745817
  8. 2014

    1. Wagner, S. (2014). Software-Produktqualität modellieren und bewerten: Der Quamoco-Ansatz. In W. Hasselbring & N. C. Ehmke (Eds.), Software Engineering (Vol. 227, pp. 69–70). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2014.html#Wagner14
    2. Wagner, S. (2014). Scrum for cyber-physical systems: a process proposal. In M. Tichy, J. Bosch, M. Goedicke, & M. Larsson (Eds.), 1st International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering, RCoSE 2014 (pp. 51–56). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593812.2593819
    3. The 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’14, Torino, Italy, September 17, 2014. (2014). In S. Wagner & M. D. Penta (Eds.), The 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’14, Torino, Italy, September 17, 2014. ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/promise/promise2014.html
    4. Gleirscher, M., Golubitskiy, D., Irlbeck, M., & Wagner, S. (2014). Introduction of static quality analysis in small- and medium-sized software enterprises: experiences from technology transfer. Software Quality Journal, 22(3), 499--542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-013-9217-z
    5. Fernández, D. M., Ognawala, S., Wagner, S., & Daneva, M. (2014). Where do we stand in requirements engineering improvement today?: first results from a mapping study. In M. Morisio, T. Dybå, & M. Torchiano (Eds.), 2014 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM ’14 (pp. 58:1-58:4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652555
    6. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2014). A Software Safety Verification Method Based on System-Theoretic Process Analysis. In A. Bondavalli, A. Ceccarelli, & F. Ortmeier (Eds.), Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security - SAFECOMP 2014 Workshops: ASCoMS, DECSoS, DEVVARTS, ISSE, ReSA4CI, SASSUR (Vol. 8696, pp. 401–412). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/safecomp/safecomp2014w.html#AbdulkhaleqW14
  9. 2013

    1. Software Engineering 2013 - Workshopband (inkl. Doktorandensymposium), Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, 26. Februar - 1. März 2013 in Aachen. (2013). In S. Wagner & H. Lichter (Eds.), Software Engineering 2013 - Workshopband (inkl. Doktorandensymposium), Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, 26. Februar - 1. März 2013 in Aachen (Vol. 215). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2013w.html
    2. Wagner, S. (2013). Software Product Quality Control (pp. I–XII, 1–210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38571-1
    3. Wagner, S. (2013). Making Software Quality Visible. In J. Heidrich, M. Oivo, A. Jedlitschka, & M. T. Baldassarre (Eds.), Product-Focused Software Process Improvement - 14th International Conference, PROFES 2013 (Vol. 7983, pp. 1–2). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/profes/profes2013.html#Wagner13
    4. Ostberg, J.-P., Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2013). A novel approach for discovering barriers in using automatic static analysis. In F. Q. B. da Silva, N. J. Juzgado, & G. H. Travassos (Eds.), 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE ’13 (pp. 78–81). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ease/ease2013.html#OstbergRW13
    5. Lochmann, K., Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2013). Are comprehensive quality models necessary for evaluating software quality? In B. Turhan (Ed.), 9th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’13 (pp. 3:1-3:9). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/promise/promise2013.html#LochmannRW13
    6. Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2013). Naming the pain in requirements engineering: design of a global family of surveys and first results from Germany. In F. Q. B. da Silva, N. J. Juzgado, & G. H. Travassos (Eds.), 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE ’13 (pp. 183–194). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460999.2461027
    7. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2013). Integrating State Machine Analysis with System-Theoretic Process Analysis. In S. Wagner & H. Lichter (Eds.), Software Engineering (Workshops) (Vol. 215, pp. 501–514). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2013w.html#AbdulkhaleqW13
  10. 2012

    1. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Heinemann, L., Kläs, M., Trendowicz, A., Plösch, R., Seidl, A., Goeb, A., & Streit, J. (2012). The Quamoco product quality modelling and assessment approach. In M. Glinz, G. C. Murphy, & M. Pezzè (Eds.), 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2012 (pp. 1133–1142). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227106
    2. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’12, Lund, Sweden, September 21-22, 2012. (2012). In S. Wagner (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’12, Lund, Sweden, September 21-22, 2012. ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/promise/promise2012.html
    3. Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2012). Do we stop learning from our mistakes when using automatic code analysis tools?: an experiment proposal. In A. Begel & C. Sadowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on User Evaluation for Software Engineering Researchers, USER ’12 (pp. 21–24). IEEE. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/user2012.html#Ostberg012
    4. Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2012). Get started imminently: Using tutorials to accelerate learning in automated static analysis. In A. V. Jones (Ed.), 2012 Imperial College Computing Student Workshop, ICCSW 2012 (Vol. 28, pp. 109–115). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iccsw/iccsw2012.html#OstbergW12
    5. Lochmann, K., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2012). A Case Study on Specifying Quality Requirements Using a Quality Model. In K. R. P. H. Leung & P. Muenchaisri (Eds.), 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC 2012 (pp. 577–582). IEEE. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/apsec/apsec2012.html#LochmannFW12
    6. Gleirscher, M., Golubitskiy, D., Irlbeck, M., & Wagner, S. (2012). On the Benefit of Automated Static Analysis for Small and Medium-Sized Software Enterprises. In S. Biffl, D. Winkler, & J. Bergsmann (Eds.), Software Quality. Process Automation in Software Development - 4th International Conference, SWQD 2012 (Vol. 94, pp. 14–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27213-4_3
    7. Deissenboeck, F., Heinemann, L., Hummel, B., & Wagner, S. (2012). Challenges of the Dynamic Detection of Functionally Similar Code Fragments. In T. Mens, A. Cleve, & R. Ferenc (Eds.), 16th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR 2012 (pp. 299–308). IEEE Computer Society. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/csmr/csmr2012.html#DeissenboeckHHW12
  11. 2011

    1. Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ESEC/FSE 2011, Szeged, Hungary, September 4, 2011. (2011). In S. Wagner, S. Chulani, & B. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ESEC/FSE 2011, Szeged, Hungary, September 4, 2011. ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/sigsoft/wosq2011.html
    2. Wagner, S. (2011). The use of application scanners in software product quality assessment. In S. Wagner, S. Chulani, & B. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ESEC/FSE 2011 (pp. 42–49). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2024587.2024597
    3. Pehmöller, A., Salger, F., & Wagner, S. (2011). Testing in Global Software Development – A Pattern Approach. Proc. 5th World Congress for Software Quality.
    4. Méndez Fernández, D., Lochmann, K., Penzenstadler, B., & Wagner, S. (2011). A Case Study on the Application of an Artefact-Based Requirements Engineering Approach. 15th Annual Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2011.0013
    5. Deissenboeck, F., Heinemann, L., Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Lochmann, K., & Wagner, S. (2011). The quamoco tool chain for quality modeling and assessment. In R. N. Taylor, H. C. Gall, & N. Medvidovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2011 (pp. 1007–1009). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2011.html#DeissenboeckHHLW11
  12. 2010

    1. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deißenböck, F., Kläs, M., Liggesmeyer, P., Münch, J., & Streit, J. (2010). Softwarequalitätsmodelle - Praxisempfehlungen und Forschungsagenda. Informatik Spektrum, 33(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00287-009-0339-4
    2. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Liggesmeyer, P., & Münch, J. (Eds.). (2010). Tagungsband des 3. Workshops zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB ’10). Technische Universität München.
    3. Wagner, S., Schätz, B., Puchner, S., & Kock, P. (2010). A Case Study on Safety Cases in the Automotive Domain: Modules, Patterns, and Models. IEEE 21st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE 2010, 269–278. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/issre/issre2010.html#WagnerSPK10
    4. Luckey, M., Baumann, A., Méndez Fernández, D., & Wagner, S. (2010). Reusing security requirements using an extended quality model. In S.-W. Lee, M. Monga, & J. Jürjens (Eds.), ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems, SESS 2010 (pp. 1–7). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/sess2010.html#LuckeyBFW10
    5. Lochmann, K., Wagner, S., Goeb, A., & Kirchler, D. (2010). Classification of Software Quality Patterns. Tagungsband Des 3. Workshops Zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung Und -Bewertung (SQMB ’10).
    6. Jürgens, E., Deissenboeck, F., Feilkas, M., Hummel, B., Schätz, B., Wagner, S., Domann, C., & Streit, J. (2010). Can clone detection support quality assessments of requirements specifications? In J. Kramer, J. Bishop, P. T. Devanbu, & S. Uchitel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2, ICSE 2010 (pp. 79–88). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2010-2.html#JurgensDFHSWDS10
    7. Islam, S., Mouratidis, H., & Wagner, S. (2010). Towards a Framework to Elicit and Manage Security and Privacy Requirements from Laws and Regulations. In R. Wieringa & A. Persson (Eds.), Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010 (Vol. 6182, pp. 255–261). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/refsq/refsq2010.html#IslamMW10
    8. Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., & Baumann, A. (2010). Field Study on Requirments Engineering Artefacts and Patterns. In M. Turner & M. Niazi (Eds.), 14th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2010. BCS. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ease/ease2010.html#Fernandez0LB10
  13. 2009

    1. Wagner, S. (2009). A Bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality models. In T. J. Ostrand (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE 2009 (p. 6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1540438.1540447
    2. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Liggesmeyer, P., & Münch, J. (Eds.). (2009). Tagungsband 2. Workshop zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB ’09). Technische Universität München.
    3. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Winter, S., Goeb, A., & Klaes, M. (2009). Quality models in practice: A preliminary analysis. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2009, 464–467. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/esem/esem2009.html#WagnerLWGK09
    4. Wagner, S., Méndez Fernández, D., Islam, S., & Lochmann, K. (2009). A Security Requirements Approach for Web Systems. Proc. Workshop Quality Assessment in Web (QAW 2009).
    5. Wagner, S., & Islam, S. (2009). Modellierung von Software-Security mit aktivitätenbasierten Qualitätsmodellen. Tagungsband 2. Workshop Zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung Und -Bewertung (SQMB ’09).
    6. Jürgens, E., Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., & Wagner, S. (2009). Do code clones matter? 31st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’09), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070547
    7. Deissenboeck, F., Jürgens, E., Lochmann, K., & Wagner, S. (2009). Software quality models: Purposes, usage scenarios and requirements. 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Quality, WoSQ@ICSE 2009, 9–14. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/wosq2009.html#DeissenboeckJL009
    8. Braun, P., Philipps, J., Schätz, B., & Wagner, S. (2009). Model-Based Safety-Cases for Software-Intensive Systems. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 238(4), 71–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2009.09.007
  14. 2008

    1. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., & Winter, S. (2008). Erfassung, Strukturierung und Überprüfung von Qualitätsanforderungen durch aktivitätenbasierte Qualitätsmodelle. In W. Maalej & B. Brügge (Eds.), Software Engineering (Workshops) (Vol. 122, pp. 464–469). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2008w.html#WagnerDW08
    2. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Münch, J., & Liggesmeyer, P. (Eds.). (2008). Workshop-Band Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB ’08). Technische Universität München.
    3. Wagner, S., & Ruhe, M. (2008). Using a Bayesian Network in the ProdFLOWTM Approach. Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Software Productivity Analysis and Cost Estimation (SPACE 2008).
    4. Wagner, S., & Ruhe, M. (2008). A Systematic Review of Productivity Factors in Software Development. Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Software Productivity Analysis and Cost Estimation (SPACE 2008).
    5. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., & Winter, S. (2008). Managing quality requirements using activity-based quality models. In B. Wong (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ICSE 2008 (pp. 29–34). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1370099.1370107
    6. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., Aichner, M., Wimmer, J., & Schwalb, M. (2008). An Evaluation of Two Bug Pattern Tools for Java. First International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation, ICST 2008, 248–257. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icst/icst2008.html#WagnerDAWS08
    7. Wagner, S., Deißenböck, F., Feilkas, M., & Jürgens, E. (2008). Software-Qualitätsmodelle in der Praxis: Erfahrungen mit aktivitätenbasierten Modellen. Workshop-Band Software-Qualitätsmodellierung Und -Bewertung (SQMB ’08).
    8. Wagner, S. (2008). Defect classification and defect types revisited. In P. T. Devanbu, B. Murphy, N. Nagappan, & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on Defects in Large Software Systems, held in conjunction with the ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 2008), DEFECTS 2008 (pp. 39–40). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/issta/defects2008.html#Wagner08
    9. Wagner, S., & Deissenboeck, F. (2008). Abstractness, Specificity, and Complexity in Software Design. Proceedings of the 2Nd International Workshop on The Role of Abstraction in Software Engineering, 35--42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1370164.1370173
    10. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., Teuchert, S., & Girard, J.-F. (2008). Assuring Maintainability in Model-Driven Development of Embedded Systems. In J. Rech & C. Bunse (Eds.), Model-Driven Software Development: Integrating Quality Assurance. Information Science Reference.
    11. Ruhe, M., & Wagner, S. (2008). Using the ProdFlow(TM) approach to address the myth of productivity in r&d organizations. In H. D. Rombach, S. G. Elbaum, & J. Münch (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2008 (pp. 339–341). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/esem/esem2008.html#RuheW08
    12. Pfaller, C., Wagner, S., Gericke, J., & Wiemann, M. (2008). Multi-Dimensional Measures for Test Case Quality. First International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation, ICST 2008, Lillehammer, Norway, April 9-11, 2008, Workshops Proceedings, 364–368. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icst/icstw2008.html#PfallerWGW08
    13. Deissenboeck, F., Jürgens, E., Hummel, B., Wagner, S., y Parareda, B. M., & Pizka, M. (2008). Tool Support for Continuous Quality Control. IEEE Software, 25(5), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2008.129
    14. Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., Jürgens, E., Schätz, B., Wagner, S., Girard, J.-F., & Teuchert, S. (2008). Clone detection in automotive model-based development. In W. Schäfer, M. B. Dwyer, & V. Gruhn (Eds.), 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2008) (pp. 603–612). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2008.html#DeissenboeckHJSWGT08
  15. 2007

    1. Winter, S., Wagner, S., & Deissenboeck, F. (2007). A Comprehensive Model of Usability. In J. Gulliksen, M. B. Harning, P. A. Palanque, G. C. van der Veer, & J. Wesson (Eds.), Engineering Interactive Systems - EIS 2007 Joint Working Conferences, EHCI 2007, DSV-IS 2007, HCSE 2007 (Vol. 4940, pp. 106–122). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92698-6_7
    2. Wagner, S. (2007). Using Economics as Basis for Modelling and Evaluating Software Quality. 2007 First International Workshop on the Economics of Software and Computation, 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESC.2007.10
    3. Wagner, S. (2007). Cost optimisation of analytical software quality assurance (pp. 1–152) [PhD Dissertation]. Technical University of Munich.
    4. Wagner, S. (2007). Global Sensitivity Analysis of Predictor Models in Software Engineering. International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering, 2007. PROMISE’07: ICSE Workshops 2007., 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROMISE.2007.7
    5. Wagner, S., & Deissenboeck, F. (2007). An Integrated Approach to Quality Modelling. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Quality, WoSQ@ICSE 2007, 1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/wosq2007.html#0001D07
    6. Wagner, S. (2007). An Approach to Global Sensitivity Analysis: FAST on COCOMO. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2007, 440–442. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/esem/esem2007.html#Wagner07
    7. Wagner, S., Xie, S., Rübel-Otterbach, M., & Sell, B. (2007). Profitability Estimation of Software Projects: A Combined Framework. APSEC 2007 Co-Located Workshop Proceedings: SPACE 2007 Workshop.
    8. Deissenboeck, F., Wagner, S., & Pizka, M. (2007). Kosten-basierte Klassifikation von Qualitätsanforderungen. Erhebung, Spezifikation Und Analyse Nichtfunktionaler Anforderungen in Der Systementwicklung.
    9. Deissenboeck, F., Wagner, S., Pizka, M., Teuchert, S., & Girard, J.-F. (2007). An Activity-Based Quality Model for Maintainability. 23rd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2007), 184–193. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icsm/icsm2007.html#DeissenboeckWPTG07
  16. 2006

    1. Wagner, S. (2006). A literature survey of the quality economics of defect-detection techniques. In G. H. Travassos, J. C. Maldonado, & C. Wohlin (Eds.), 2006 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2006) (pp. 194–203). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159763
    2. Wagner, S. (2006). A model and sensitivity analysis of the quality economics of defect-detection techniques. In L. L. Pollock & M. Pezzè (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM/SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2006 (pp. 73–84). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1146238.1146247
    3. Wagner, S., & Fischer, H. (2006). A Software Reliability Model Based on a Geometric Sequence of Failure Rates. In L. M. Pinho & M. G. Harbour (Eds.), Reliable Software Technologies - Ada-Europe 2006, 11th Ada-Europe International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies (Vol. 4006, pp. 143–154). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11767077_12
    4. Wagner, S. (2006). Modelling the Quality Economics of Defect-detection Techniques. Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Software Quality, WoSQ@ICSE 2006, 69--74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1137702.1137716
    5. Wagner, S., & Meisinger, M. (2006). Integrating a model of analytical quality assurance into the V-Modell XT. In J. Mayer, N. Gupta, & Y. Ledru (Eds.), Third International Workshop on Software Quality Assurance, SOQUA 2006 (pp. 38–45). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1188895.1188906
    6. Cengarle, M. V., Graubmann, P., & Wagner, S. (2006). Semantics of UML 2.0 Interactions with Variabilities. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 160, 141–155. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/entcs/entcs160.html#CengarleGW06
  17. 2005

    1. Wagner, S., & Seifert, T. (2005). Software quality economics for defect-detection techniques using failure prediction. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30(4), 1–6. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/sigsoft/sigsoft30.html#WagnerS05
    2. Wagner, S. (2005). Towards Software Quality Economics for Defect-Detection Techniques. 29th Annual IEEE / NASA Software Engineering Workshop (SEW-29 2005), 265–274. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/sew/sew2005.html#Wagner05
    3. Wagner, S., Jürjens, J., Koller, C., & Trischberger, P. (2005). Comparing Bug Finding Tools with Reviews and Tests. In F. Khendek & R. Dssouli (Eds.), Testing of Communicating Systems, 17th IFIP TC6/WG 6.1 International Conference, TestCom 2005 (Vol. 3502, pp. 40–55). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/pts/testcom2005.html#WagnerJKT05
    4. Wagner, S., & Jürjens, J. (2005). Model-Based Identification of Fault-Prone Components. In M. D. Cin, M. Kaâniche, & A. Pataricza (Eds.), Dependable Computing - EDCC-5, 5th European Dependable Computing Conference (Vol. 3463, pp. 435–452). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/edcc/edcc2005.html#WagnerJ05
    5. Pretschner, A., Prenninger, W., Wagner, S., Kühnel, C., Baumgartner, M., Sostawa, B., Zölch, R., & Stauner, T. (2005). One evaluation of model-based testing and its automation. In G.-C. Roman, W. G. Griswold, & B. Nuseibeh (Eds.), 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2005) (pp. 392–401). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1062455.1062529
  18. 2004

    1. Cengarle, M. V., Graubmann, P., & Wagner, S. (2004). From Feature Models to Variation Representation in MSCs. 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability Management (SVM’04).
  19. 2002

    1. Wagner, S. (2002). A Data Warehouse for Cross-Species Anatomy [MSc Dissertation].
  20. 2001

    1. Wagner, S. (2001). Konzeption, Design und Implementierung eines web-basierten Mail-Clients auf Basis von Java-Servlets mit Schnittstellen zu weiteren web-basierten Groupware-Applikationen [Diplomarbeit]. University of Applied Sciences Augsburg.
To the top of the page