Dieses Bild zeigt Graziotin

Dr.

Daniel Graziotin

Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow
ISTE - Institute of Software Technology
SE - Software Engineering Group

Contact

+49 711 685-88338
+49 711 685-88380

Website

Universitätsstraße 38
70569 Stuttgart
Deutschland
Room: 1.232

Consultation

By e-mail appointment. Please contact me at least a week before your intended appointment.

Subject

  • Behavioral software engineering
  • Empirical software engineering
  • Human aspects of software engineering
  • Metascience
  • Journalology
The following publications pertain to ISTE-SE only. All my publications are available here: ineed.coffee/publications:
  1. Mäntylä, M. V., Graziotin, D., & Kuutila, M. (2018). The Evolution of Sentiment Analysis-A Review of Research Topics, Venues, and Top Cited Papers. Computer Science Review, 27, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.10.002
  2. Käfer, V., Graziotin, D., Bogicevic, I., Wagner, S., & Ramadani, J. (2018). Communication in Open-source Projects-End of the E-Mail Era? In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings (pp. 242--243). Gothenburg, Sweden: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3194951
  3. Pano, A., Graziotin, D., & Abrahamsson, P. (2018). Factors and actors leading to the adoption of a JavaScript framework. Empirical Software Engineering, 947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9613-x
  4. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2018). What happens when software developers are (un)happy. Journal of Systems and Software, 140, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.041
  5. Prechelt, L., Graziotin, D., & Fernández, D. M. (2018). A community’s perspective on the status and future of peer review in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 95, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.019
  6. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017c). Unhappy developers: Bad for themselves, bad for process, and bad for software product. Unhappy developers: Bad for themselves, bad for process, and bad for software product (Vol. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, pp. 362–364). IEEE Press.
  7. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017b). On the Unhappiness of Software Developers. On the Unhappiness of Software Developers (Vol. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE’17), pp. 324–333).
  8. Moretti, M., Gobbato, F., Trevisiol, S., Seta, G., Graziotin, D., Corrent, C., … Orlandi, S. (2017). People’s Republic Of Bolzano. Sciences Du Design, 5, 18–21.
  9. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017a). Consequences of unhappiness while developing software. Consequences of unhappiness while developing software (Vol. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering, pp. 42–47). IEEE Press.
  10. Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., … others. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.1
  11. Ostberg, J.-P., Graziotin, D., Wagner, S., & Derntl, B. (2017). Towards the assessment of stress and emotional responses of a salutogenesis-enhanced software tool using psychophysiological measurements. Towards the assessment of stress and emotional responses of a salutogenesis-enhanced software tool using psychophysiological measurements (Vol. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering, pp. 22–25). IEEE Press.
  12. Tennant, J., Graziotin, D., & Kearns, S. (2017). We have the technology to save peer review-now it is up to our communities to implement it. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
  13. Pflüger, D., Mehl, M., Valentin, J., Lindner, F., Pfander, D., Wagner, S., … Wang, Y. (2016). The scalability-efficiency/maintainability-portability trade-off in simulation software engineering: Examples and a preliminary systematic literature review Software Engineering for. The scalability-efficiency/maintainability-portability trade-off in simulation software engineering: Examples and a preliminary systematic literature review Software Engineering for (Vol. High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering (SE-HPCCSE), 2016 Fourth International Workshop on, pp. 26–34). IEEE.
  14. Graziotin, D. (2016). Software quality information needs. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2, e8865. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8865

Forschungsmethoden in der Softwaretechnik

Seminar Human Aspects in Software Engineering

Seminar Human Aspects in Software Engineering

Dr. Daniel Graziotin is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Stuttgart, Germany. His research interests include human, behavioral, and psychological aspects of empirical software engineering, studies of science, and open science. He is associate editor at the Journal of Open Research Software and academic editor at the Research Ideas and Outcomes (RIO) journal. Daniel was awarded an Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship for postdoctoral researchers in 2017, the European Design Award (bronze) in 2016, and the Data Journalism Award in 2015. He received his Ph.D. in computer science at the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy.

I welcome students to approach me for starting a thesis or any other project type.
Students should keep in mind that I will be way more motivated to accept a supervision task when the proposal:

  1. originates from students themselves
  2. is in English
  3. is related to my research interests

Of these requirements, I find the first one to be the most important. I expect my students to approach me with at least a broad idea of what they would like to work on. No, "a work on software engineering" is not enough.
The second point can be relaxed but students can not expect a professional correction of their text due to language barriers.
The third point can also be relaxed if the proposal is about an interesting avenue of research.