This image shows Stefan Wagner

Stefan Wagner

Prof. Dr.

Head of the Empirical Software Engineering Group
Institute of Software Engineering (ISTE)
Empirical Software Engineering (ESE)

Contact

+49 711 685 88455
+49 711 685 88380

Website

Universitätsstraße 38
70569 Stuttgart
Deutschland
Room: 1.225

Office Hours

Tuesday, 15:45–16:15

At present, only online. Please contact me by mail beforehand:

https://unistuttgart.webex.com/meet/stefan.wagner

Join by phone
+49-619-6781-9736 Germany Toll
+49-69-2551-14400 Germany Toll 2
Access code: 841 915 204

Subject

  • Software and systems engineering
  • Empirical studies
  • Software quality
  • Human aspects in software engineering
  • Automotive software
  • Software engineering for AI-based systems
  1. 2023

    1. Mauser, L., Wagner, S., & Ziegler, P. (2023). Methodical Approach for Centralization Evaluation of Modern Automotive E/E Architectures (T. Batista, T. Bures, C. Raibulet, & H. Muccini, Eds.).
  2. 2022

    1. Betka, M., & Wagner, S. (2022). Towards practical application of mutation testing in industry -- Traditional versus extreme mutation testing. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2450
    2. Ebert, V., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2022). How Are Communication Channels on GitHub Presented to Their Intended Audience? -- A Thematic Analysis. The International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2022, 40--49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530019.3530024
    3. Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Haug, M., Franco da Silva, A. C., Rubner, C., Saft, M., Sauer, H., & Wagner, S. (2022). Adopting microservices and DevOps in the cyber-physical systems domain: A rapid review and case study. Journal of Software: Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3169
    4. Graf-Vlachy, L., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2022). Text and Team: What Article Metadata Characteristics Drive Citations in Software Engineering? Proceedings of the International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2022, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530019.3530022
    5. Haug, M., Franco da Silva, A. C., & Wagner, S. (2022). Towards Immediate Feedback for Security Relevant Code in Development Environments. In J. Barzen, F. Leymann, & S. Dustdar (Eds.), 16th Symposium and Summer School on Service-Oriented Computing, SummerSOC 2022 (Vol. 1603, pp. 68–75). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18304-1_4
    6. Hellhake, D., Bogner, J., Schmid, T., & Wagner, S. (2022). Towards using coupling measures to guide black-box integration testing in component-based systems. Software Test, Verification & Reliability, 32(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.1811
    7. Marner, K., Wagner, S., & Ruhe, G. (2022). Stakeholder identification for a structured release planning approach in the automotive domain. Requirements Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-021-00369-x
    8. Marner, K., Wagner, S., & Ruhe, G. (2022). Release Planning Patterns for the Automotive Domain. Computers, 11(89), Article 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11060089
    9. Martínez-Fernández, S., Bogner, J., Franch, X., Oriol, M., Siebert, J., Trendowicz, A., Vollmer, A. M., & Wagner, S. (2022). Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 31(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487043
    10. Santhanam, S., Hecking, T., Schreiber, A., & Wagner, S. (2022). Bots in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. PeerJ Computer Science, 8:e866. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.866
  3. 2021

    1. Abella, J., Alcaide, S., Anders, J., Bas, F., Becker, S., De Mulder, E., Elhamawy, N., Gürkaynak, F. K., Handschuh, H., Hernandez, C., Hutter, M., Kosmidis, L., Polian, I., Sauer, M., Wagner, S., & Regazzoni, F. (2021). Security, Reliability and Test Aspects of the RISC-V Ecosystem. 2021 IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETS50041.2021.9465449
    2. Betka, M., & Wagner, S. (2021). Extreme mutation testing in practice: An industrial case study. 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation in Software Test (AST).
    3. Graziotin, D., Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., & Wagner, S. (2021). Psychometrics in Behavioral Software Engineering: A Methodological Introduction with Guidelines. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 31(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469888
    4. Habib, M. K., Wagner, S., & Graziotin, D. (2021). Detecting Requirements Smells With Deep Learning: Experiences, Challenges and Future Work. 2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 153--156.
    5. Niedermaier, S., Zelenik, T., Heisse, S., & Wagner, S. (2021). Evaluate and control service and transaction dependability of complex IoT systems. Software Quality Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-021-09556-z
    6. Shihab, E., Wagner, S., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021). Summary of the 2nd International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE 2020). ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 46(1), Article 1.
    7. Spiegler, S. V., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2021). An empirical study on changing leadership in agile teams. Empirical Software Engineering, 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-09949-5
    8. Trieflinger, S., Münch, J., Wagner, S., Lang, D., & Roling, B. (2021). A Transformation Model for Excelling in Product Roadmapping in Dynamic and Uncertain Market Environments. In L. Ardito, A. Jedlitschka, M. Morisio, & M. Torchiano (Eds.), Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 136--151). Springer International Publishing.
    9. Wyrich, M., Preikschat, A., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2021). The Mind Is a Powerful Place: How Showing Code Comprehensibility Metrics Influences Code Understanding. In A. van Deursen & T. Xie (Eds.), 43rd International Conference of Software Engineering (ICSE 2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09590
    10. Yu, J., Wagner, S., & Luo, F. (2021). Automatic Generation of Security Requirements for Cyber-Physical Systems. In S. Paiva, S. I. Lopes, R. Zitouni, N. Gupta, S. F. Lopes, & T. Yonezawa (Eds.), Science and Technologies for Smart Cities (pp. 372--385). Springer International Publishing.
    11. Yu, J., Wagner, S., & Luo, F. (2021). Data-flow-based adaption of the System-Theoretic Process Analysis for Security (STPA). PeerJ Computer Science, 7(e362), Article e362. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.362
    12. Yu, J., Wagner, S., & Luo, F. (2021). Data-flow-based adaption of the System-Theoretic Process Analysis for Security (STPA-Sec). PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e362. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.362
    13. Yu, J., Wagner, S., Wang, B., & Luo, F. (2021). A Systematic Mapping Study on Security Countermeasures of In-Vehicle Communication Systems. SAE International Journal on Transportation Cybersecurity & Privacy, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4271/11-04-02-0005
  4. 2020

    1. Barón, M. M., Wyrich, M., & Wagner, S. (2020, October). An Empirical Validation of Cognitive Complexity as a Measure of Source Code Understandability. Proceedings of the 14th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3382494.3410636
    2. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). Scenario-based Evolvability Analysis of Service-oriented Systems: A Lightweight and Tool-supported Method. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, 204--215. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009463902040215
    3. Bogner, J., Weller, A., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). Exploring Maintainability Assurance Research for Service- and Microservice-Based Systems: Directions and Differences. In L. Cruz-Filipe, S. Giallorenzo, F. Montesi, M. Peressotti, F. Rademacher, & S. Sachweh (Eds.), Joint Post-proceedings of the First and Second International Conference on Microservices (Microservices2017/2019) (Vol. 78, pp. 3:1--3:22). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.Microservices.2017-2019.3
    4. Justus, B., Stefan, W., & Alfred, Z. (2020). Collecting Service-Based Maintainability Metrics from RESTful API Descriptions: Static Analysis and Threshold Derivation. Software Architecture. ECSA 2020., 1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59155-7_16
    5. Krusche, S., & Wagner, S. (2020). Software Engineering im Unterricht der Hochschulen 2020. Software Engineering 2020, 239–240. https://doi.org/10.18420/SE2020_65
    6. Tagungsband des 17. Workshops “Software Engineering im Unterricht der Hochschulen” 2020, Innsbruck, Österreich, 26. - 27.02.2020. (2020). In S. Krusche & S. Wagner (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2531). CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2531/
    7. Mindermann, K., & Wagner, S. (2020). Fluid intelligence doesn’t matter!: effects of code examples on the usability of crypto APIs. ICSE ’20: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, 306–607. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377812.3390892
    8. Niedermaier, S., Heisse, S., & Wagner, S. (2020). Correct and Control Complex IoT Systems: Evaluation of a Classification for System Anomalies. 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00050
    9. Niedermayr, R., Röhm, T., & Wagner, S. (2020). Too trivial to test? An inverse view on defect prediction to identify methods with low fault risk. Software Engineering 2020, 137–138. https://doi.org/10.18420/SE2020_41
    10. Ostberg, J.-P., Graziotin, D., Wagner, S., & Derntl, B. (2020). A methodology for psycho-biological assessment of stress in software engineering. PeerJ Computer Science, 6, e286. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.286
    11. Polian, I., Anders, J., Becker, S., Bernardi, P., Chakrabarty, K., ElHamawy, N., Sauer, M., Singh, A., Reorda, M. S., & Wagner, S. (2020). Exploring the Mysteries of System-Level Test. 2020 IEEE 29th Asian Test Symposium (ATS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS49688.2020.9301557
    12. Spiegler, S. V., Graziotin, D., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2020). A Quantitative Exploration of the 9-Factor Theory: Distribution of Leadership Roles Between Scrum Master and Agile Team. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2020., 383. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49392-9_11
    13. Wagner, S. (2020). Optimising Analytical Software Quality Assurance. International Conference on Software Quality (SWQD 2020), 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35510-4_9
    14. Wyrich, M., Hebig, R., Wagner, S., & Scandariato, R. (2020). Perception and Acceptance of an Autonomous Refactoring Bot. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009168803030310
    15. Yu, J., Wagner, S., & Luo, F. (2020). A STPA-based Approach for Systematic Security Analysis of In-vehicle Diagnostic and Software Update Systems. FISITA Web Congress 2020. https://www.fisita.com/events/web-congress/2020/agenda
  5. 2019

    1. Avezum, M., Seitz, A., Wagner, S., & Bruegge, B. (2019). Interdisciplinary System Courses - Teaching Agile Systems Engineering. In S. Krusche, K. Schneider, M. Kuhrmann, R. Heinrich, R. Jung, M. Konersmann, E. Schmieders, S. Helke, I. Schaefer, A. Vogelsang, B. Annighöfer, A. Schweiger, M. Reich, & A. van Hoorn (Eds.), Software Engineering (Workshops) (Vol. 2308, pp. 11–18). CEUR-WS.org. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2019w.html#AvezumSWB19
    2. Becker, S., Bogicevic, I., Herzwurm, G., & Wagner, S. (Eds.). (2019). Software Engineering and Software Management, SE/SWM 2019, Stuttgart, Germany, February 18-22, 2019. P-292. https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/21116
    3. Bogner, J., Boceck, T., Popp, M., Tschechlov, D., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Towards a Collaborative Repository for the Documentation of Service-Based Antipatterns and Bad Smells. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), 95--101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00025
    4. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Microservices in Industry: Insights into Technologies, Characteristics, and Software Quality. ICSA Companion, 187–195. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icsa/icsa2019c.html#BognerF0Z19
    5. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Assuring the Evolvability of Microservices: Insights into Industry Practices and Challenges. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00089
    6. Bogner, J., Schlinger, S., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). A Modular Approach to Calculate Service-Based Maintainability Metrics from Runtime Data of Microservices. In X. Franch, T. Männistö, & S. Martínez-Fernández (Eds.), 20th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES’19) (Vol. 11915, pp. 489–496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_34
    7. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). On the impact of service-oriented patterns on software evolvability: a controlled experiment and metric-based analysis. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e213. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.213
    8. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Using architectural modifiability tactics to examine evolution qualities of Service- and Microservice-Based Systems. SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems, 34(2–3), Article 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-019-00402-z
    9. Fernández, D. M., Franch, X., Seyff, N., Felderer, M., Glinz, M., Kalinowski, M., Vogelsang, A., Wagner, S., Bühne, S., & Lauenroth, K. (2019). Do We Preach What We Practice? Investigating the Practical Relevance of Requirements Engineering Syllabi - The IREB Case. CoRR, abs/1902.01822. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1902.html#abs-1902-01822
    10. Fritzsch, J., Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Microservices Migration in Industry: Intentions, Strategies, and Challenges. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00081
    11. Hellhake, D., Schmid, T., & Wagner, S. (2019). Using Data Flow-Based Coverage Criteria for Black-Box Integration Testing of Distributed Software Systems. ICST, 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2019.00051
    12. Koetter, F., Blohm, M., Drawehn, J., Kochanowski, M., Goetzer, J., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). Conversational Agents for Insurance Companies: From Theory to Practice. In H. J. van den Herik, A. P. Rocha, & L. Steels (Eds.), ICAART (Revised Selected Papers) (Vol. 11978, pp. 338–362). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icaart/icaart2019s.html#KoetterBDKGG019
    13. Koetter, F., Blohm, M., Kochanowski, M., Goetzer, J., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). Motivations, Classification and Model Trial of Conversational Agents for Insurance Companies. In A. P. Rocha, L. Steels, & J. van den Herik (Eds.), ICAART (1) (pp. 19–30). SciTePress. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icaart/icaart2019-1.html#KoetterBKGG019
    14. Koetter, F., Kochanowski, M., Kintz, M., Kersjes, B., Bogicevic, I., & Wagner, S. (2019). Assessing Software Quality of Agile Student Projects by Data-mining Software Repositories. In H. Lane, S. Zvacek, & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), CSEDU (2) (pp. 244–251). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007688602440251
    15. Marner, K., Theobald, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). Real-Life Challenges in Automotive Release Planning. In M. Ganzha, L. A. Maciaszek, & M. Paprzycki (Eds.), FedCSIS (pp. 831–839). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/fedcsis/fedcsis2019.html#MarnerT019
    16. Marner, K., Theobald, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). Release Planning in a Hybrid Project Environment. Advances in Agile and User-Centred Software Engineering. LASD 2019, MIDI 2019, 376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37534-8_2
    17. Mindermann, K., & Wagner, S. (2019). Towards a central, distributed and secure default cryptography parameter set. Crypto Day Matters 30. https://doi.org/10.18420/cdm-2019-30-25
    18. Murphy-Hill, E. R., & Wagner, S. (2019). Software Productivity Through the Lens of Knowledge Work. In C. Sadowski & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 57–65). Apress open / Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/collections/SZ2019.html#Murphy-Hill019
    19. Niedermaier, S., Koetter, F., Freymann, A., & Wagner, S. (2019). On Observability and Monitoring of Distributed Systems - An Industry Interview Study. Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC 2019, 11895. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33702-5_3
    20. Niedermayr, R., Röhm, T., & Wagner, S. (2019). Too trivial to test? An inverse view on defect prediction to identify methods with low fault risk. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e187. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.187
    21. Niedermayr, R., & Wagner, S. (2019). Is the Stack Distance Between Test Case and Method Correlated with Test Effectiveness? In S. Ali & V. Garousi (Eds.), EASE ’19: Proceedings of the Evaluation and Assessment on Software Engineering (pp. 189–198). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319008.3319021
    22. Roehm, T., Veihelmann, D., Wagner, S., & Jürgens, E. (2019). Evaluating Maintainability Prejudices with a Large-Scale Study of Open-Source Projects. In D. Winkler, S. Biffl, & J. Bergsmann (Eds.), SWQD (Vol. 338, pp. 151–171). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/swqd/swqd2019.html#RoehmV0J19
    23. Shihab, E., & Wagner, S. (Eds.). (2019). Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering, BotSE@ICSE 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 28, 2019. IEEE / ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/botse2019.html
    24. Spiegler, S. V., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2019). Leadership Gap in Agile Teams: How Teams and Scrum Masters Mature. In P. Kruchten, S. Fraser, & F. Coallier (Eds.), XP (Vol. 355, pp. 37–52). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/xpu/xp2019.html#SpieglerH019
    25. Spiegler, S. V., Heinecke, C., & Wagner, S. (2019). The Influence of Culture and Structure on Autonomous Teams in Established Companies. In R. Hoda (Ed.), XP Workshops (Vol. 364, pp. 46–54). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/xpu/xp2019w.html#SpieglerH019a
    26. Wagner, S., & Deissenboeck, F. (2019). Defining Productivity in Software Engineering. In C. Sadowski & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 29–38). Apress open / Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/collections/SZ2019.html#0001D19
    27. Wagner, S., Fernández, D. M., Felderer, M., Vetrò, A., Kalinowski, M., Wieringa, R. J., Pfahl, D., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.-T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayebi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., … Winkler, D. (2019). Status Quo in Requirements Engineering: A Theory and a Global Family of Surveys. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 28(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306607
    28. Wagner, S., & Murphy-Hill, E. R. (2019). Factors That Influence Productivity: A Checklist. In C. Sadowski & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering (pp. 69–84). Apress open / Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/collections/SZ2019.html#WagnerM19
    29. Wang, Y., Graziotin, D., Kriso, S., & Wagner, S. (2019). Communication channels in safety analysis: An industrial exploratory case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 153, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.004
    30. Wyrich, M., Graziotin, D., & Wagner, S. (2019). A theory on individual characteristics of successful coding challenge solvers. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e173. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.173
  6. 2018

    1. Abdulkhaleq, A., Baumeister, M., Böhmert, H., & Wagner, S. (2018). Missing no Interaction – Using STPA for Identifying Hazardous Interactions of Automated Driving Systems. International Journal of Safety Science, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24900/ijss/0201115124.2018.0301
    2. Bogner, J., Choudhary, B., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2018). Towards a Generalizable Comparison of the Maintainability of Object-Oriented and Service-Oriented Applications. Workshop Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing (ESOCC’18), 1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63161-1_9
    3. Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2018). Limiting Technical Debt with Maintainability Assurance – An Industry Survey on Used Techniques and Differences with Service- and Microservice-Based Systems. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt’18). https://doi.org/10.1145/3194164.3194166
    4. Bogner, J., Zimmermann, A., & Wagner, S. (2018). Analyzing the Relevance of SOA Patterns for Microservice-Based Systems. Proceedings of the 10th Central European Workshop on Services and Their Composition (ZEUS’18), 9--16. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2072/paper2.pdf
    5. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2018). Spreadsheet guardian: An approach to protecting semantic correctness throughout the evolution of spreadsheets (journal-first abstract). 2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2018.8330242
    6. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2018). Spreadsheet Guardian: An Approach for Protecting Semantic Correctness throughout the Evolution of Spreadsheets. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1934
    7. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2018). Spreadsheet guardian: An approach to protecting semantic correctness throughout the evolution of spreadsheets. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1934
    8. Käfer, V., Graziotin, D., Bogicevic, I., Wagner, S., & Ramadani, J. (2018). Communication in Open-source Projects-end of the e-Mail Era? Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings, 242--243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3194951
    9. Käfer, V., Wagner, S., & Koschke, R. (2018). Are there functionally similar code clones in practice? 2018 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Software Clones (IWSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSC.2018.8327312
    10. Mendez, D., & Wagner, S. (2018). NaPiRE Data Set 2013. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5844789.v1
    11. Mendez, D., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Mafra, P., Vetro, A., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.-T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayebi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Pfahl, D., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., … Wieringa, R. (2018). NaPiRE Data Set 2014. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5845083.v1
    12. Mindermann, K., Keck, P., & Wagner, S. (2018). How Usable are Rust Cryptography APIs? Proceedings of the International Conference Software on Quality, Reliability, and Security. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04929
    13. Mindermann, K., & Wagner, S. (2018). Usability and Security Effects of Code Examples on Crypto APIs - CryptoExamples: A platform for free, minimal, complete and secure crypto examples. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01095
    14. Niedermayr, R., Röhm, T., & Wagner, S. (2018). Identification of methods with low fault risk. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings (ICSE ’18), 390–391. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3195022
    15. Stach, C. S., Alpers, S., Betz, S., Dürr, F., Fritsch, A., Mindermann, K., Murthy Palanisamy, S., Schiefer, G., Wagner, M., Mitschang, B., Oberweis, A., & Wagner, S. (2018). The AVARE PATRON - A Holistic Privacy Approach for the Internet of Things. In P. Samarati & M. S. Obaidat (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications: Vol. 1: SECRYPT. Scitepress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006850305380545
    16. Software Engineering und Software Management 2018, Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, SE 2018, 5.-9. März 2018, Ulm, Germany. (2018). In M. Tichy, E. Bodden, M. Kuhrmann, S. Wagner, & J.-P. Steghöfer (Eds.), LNI: Vol. P-279. Gesellschaft für Informatik. https://doi.org/978-3-88579-673-2
    17. Wagner, S., Fernández, D. M., Kalinowski, M., & Felderer, M. (2018). Agile Requirements Engineering in Practice: Status Quo and Critical Problems. CLEI Electron. J., 21(1), Article 1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/cleiej/cleiej21.html#0001FKF18
    18. Wagner, S., Tichy, M., Felderer, M., & Leue, S. (2018). Verlässliche Software im 21. Jahrhundert. Informatik-Spektrum, 41(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-018-1118-x
    19. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2018). Combining STPA and BDD for safety analysis and verification in agile development. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings (ICSE ’18), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3194973
    20. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2018). On groupthink in safety analysis: an industrial case study. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP ’18), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183519.3183538
    21. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2018). Combining STPA and BDD for Safety Analysis and Verification in Agile Development: A Controlled Experiment. XP 2018: Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, 314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_3
  7. 2017

    1. Abdulkhaleq, A., Lammering, D., Wagner, S., Röder, J., Balbierer, N., Ramsauer, L., Raste, T., & Boehmert, H. (2017). A Systematic Approach Based on STPA for Developing a Dependable Architecture for Fully Automated Driving Vehicles. Procedia Engineering, 179, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.094
    2. Abdulkhaleq, A., Wagner, S., Lammering, D., Boehmert, H., & Blueher, P. (2017). Using STPA in Compliance with ISO 26262 for Developing a Safe Architecture for Fully Automated Vehicles. Proc. Automotive - Safety & Security 2017.
    3. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Towards a practical maintainability quality model for service-and microservice-based systems. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Architecture Companion Proceedings - ECSA ’17, 3, 195--198. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129790.3129816
    4. Bogner, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Automatically measuring the maintainability of service- and microservice-based systems: a literature review. Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 12th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, 107--115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143434.3143443
    5. Femmer, H., Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., & Eder, S. (2017). Rapid quality assurance with Requirements Smells. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.047
    6. Femmer, H., Mendez Fernandez, D., Wagner, S., & Eder, S. (2017). Rapid Quality Assurance with Requirements Smells. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.047
    7. Kalinowski, M., Curty, P., Paes, A., Ferreira, A., Sp\’ınola, R., Fernández, D. M., Felderer, M., & Wagner, S. (2017). Supporting Defect Causal Analysis in Practice with Cross-company Data on Causes of Requirements Engineering Problems. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track, 223--232. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2017.14
    8. Karimi Dehkordi, Z., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2017). Links between the personalities, styles and performance in computer programming. In J. Jürjens & K. Schneider (Eds.), Software Engineering 2017: Vol. P-267. Gesellschaft für Informatik. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2017.html#KarimiBG017
    9. Kulesz, D., Käfer, V., & Wagner, S. (2017). How Spreadsheet Users Maintain Unknown Spreadsheets. Proc. 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering Methods in Spreadsheets (SEMS’17).
    10. Käfer, V., Kulesz, D., & Wagner, S. (2017). What Is the Best Way For Developers to Learn New Software Tools? An Empirical Comparison Between a Text and a Video Tutorial. Programming Journal, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2017/1/17
    11. Mindermann, K., Riedel, F., Abdulkhaleq, A., Stach, C., & Wagner, S. (2017). Exploratory Study of the Privacy Extension for System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA-Priv) to Elicit Privacy Risks in eHealth. 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2017.30
    12. Ostberg, J.-P., Graziotin, D., Wagner, S., & Derntl, B. (2017, May). Towards the Assessment of Stress and Emotional Responses of a Salutogenesis-Enhanced Software Tool Using Psychophysiological Measurements. 2017 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion). https://doi.org/10.1109/semotion.2017.4
    13. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). How Do Coupled File Changes Influence How Developers Seek Help During Maintenance Tasks? 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS). https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS.2017.50
    14. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). Mining Java Packages for Developer Profiles: An Exploratory Study. In B. Mitschang, N. Ritter, H. Schwarz, M. Klettke, A. Thor, O. Kopp, & M. Wieland (Eds.), Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web (BTW 2017) - Workshopband: Vol. P-266. Gesellschaft für Informatik.
    15. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). Are suggestions from coupled file changes useful for perfective maintenance tasks? PeerJ Computer Science, 3(e135), Article e135. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.135
    16. Stach, C., Dürr, F., Mindermann, K., Murthy Palanisamy, S., Tariq, M. A., Mitschang, B., & Wagner, S. (2017). PATRON - Datenschutz in Datenstromverarbeitungssystemen. GI-Jahrestagung 2017.
    17. Vöst, S., & Wagner, S. (2017). Keeping Continuous Deliveries Safe. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, 259--261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.135
    18. Wagner, S., Méndez Fernández, D., Felderer, M., & Kalinowski, M. (2017). Requirements Engineering Practice and Problems in Agile Projects: Results from an International Survey. Proceedings of the XX Iberoamerican Conference on Software Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 22-23, 2017, 389–402.
    19. Wang, Y., Bogicevic, I., & Wagner, S. (2017). A study of safety documentation in a Scrum development process. XP Workshops 2017.
    20. Wang, Y., Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2017). An Exploratory Study on Applying a Scrum Development Process for Safety-Critical Systems. PROFES 2017: Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 10611, 324–340.
    21. Wyrich, M., Bogicevic, I., & Wagner, S. (2017). Improving Communication in Scrum Teams. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2017, 10611, 602–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_50
  8. 2016

    1. Baltes, S., & Wagner, S. (2016). Empirical Research Plan: Effects of Sketching on Program Comprehension. In H. Sharp & T. Hall (Eds.), XP (Vol. 251, pp. 281–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_26
    2. Dehkordi, Z. K., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2016). Links between the personalities, styles and performance in computer programming. Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.011
    3. Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Mafra, P., Vetrò, A., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.-T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T., Nayabi, M., Oivo, M., Penzenstadler, B., Pfahl, D., Prikladnicki, R., Ruhe, G., Schekelmann, A., Sen, S., … Wieringa, R. (2016). Naming the pain in requirements engineering: Contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empirical Software Engineering, 1--41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9451-7
    4. Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Conte, T., Spínola, R. O., Prikladnicki, R., Winkler, D., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2016). Preventing Incomplete/Hidden Requirements: Reflections on Survey Data from Austria and Brazil. In D. Winkler, S. Biffl, & J. Bergsmann (Eds.), Software Quality. The Future of Systems- and Software Development, 8th International Conference, SWQD 2016 (Vol. 238, pp. 63–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27033-3_5
    5. Mafra, P., Kalinowski, M., Fernández, D. M., Felderer, M., & Wagner, S. (2016). Towards Guidelines for Preventing Critical Requirements Engineering Problems. 42th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2016, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2016.50
    6. Mindermann, K., Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2016). Assessing iterative practical software engineering courses with play money. In L. K. Dillon, W. Visser, & L. Williams (Eds.), ICSE (Companion Volume) (pp. 754–755). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2016c.html#MindermannO016
    7. Méndez Fernández, D., & Wagner, S. (2016). Case studies in industry: what we have learnt. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry, CESI@ICSE 2016, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896839.2896844
    8. Niedermayr, R., Jürgens, E., & Wagner, S. (2016). Will my tests tell me if I break this code? Proceedings of the International Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery, CSED@ICSE 2016, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896941.2896944
    9. Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2016). At Ease with Your Warnings: The Principles of the Salutogenesis Model Applied to Automatic Static Analysis. IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, SANER 2016, 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2016.63
    10. Ostberg, J.-P., Wagner, S., & Weilemann, E. (2016). Does personality influence the usage of static analysis tools?: an explorative experiment. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE@ICSE 2016, 75–81. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/chase2016.html#Ostberg0W16
    11. Pfluger, D., Mehl, M., Valentin, J., Lindner, F., Pfander, D., Wagner, S., Graziotin, D., & Wang, Y. (2016, November). The Scalability-Efficiency/Maintainability-Portability Trade-Off in Simulation Software Engineering: Examples and a Preliminary Systematic Literature Review. 2016 Fourth International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering (SE-HPCCSE). https://doi.org/10.1109/se-hpccse.2016.008
    12. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2016). Are Suggestions of Coupled File Changes Interesting? In L. A. Maciaszek & J. Filipe (Eds.), ENASE (pp. 15–26). SciTePress. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/enase/enase2016.html#Ramadani016
    13. Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2016). Which Change Sets in Git Repositories Are Related? 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security, QRS 2016, 406–411. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/qrs/qrs2016.html#Ramadani016
    14. Wagner, S. (2016). Natural language processing is no free lunch. In T. Menzies, L. Williams, & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Perspectives on Data Science for Software Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804206-9.00033-7
    15. Wagner, S., Abdulkhaleq, A., Bogicevic, I., Ostberg, J.-P., & Ramadani, J. (2016). How are functionally similar code clones syntactically different? An empirical study and a benchmark. PeerJ Computer Science, 2:e49. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.49
    16. Wagner, S., Abdulkhaleq, A., Kaya, K., & Paar, A. (2016). On the Relationship of Inconsistent Software Clones and Faults: An Empirical Study. IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, SANER 2016, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2016.94
    17. Wang, Y., & Wagner, S. (2016). Towards applying a safety analysis and verification method based on STPA to agile software development. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Continuous Software Evolution and Delivery, CSED@ICSE 2016, 5–11. https://doi.org/doi:10.1145/2896941.2896948
  9. 2015

    1. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2015). Integrated Safety Analysis Using Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis and Software Model Checking. In F. Koornneef & C. van Gulijk (Eds.), Computer safety, reliability, and security : 34th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2015 (Vol. 9337, pp. 121–134). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/safecomp/safecomp2015.html#Abdulkhaleq015
    2. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2015). A controlled experiment for the empirical evaluation of safety analysis techniques for safety-critical software. In J. Lv, H. J. Zhang, & M. A. Babar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (pp. 16:1-16:10). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745802.2745817
    3. Abdulkhaleq, A., Wagner, S., & Leveson, N. (2015). A comprehensive safety engineering approach for software-intensive systems based on STPA. Procedia Engineering, abs/1612.03109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.498
    4. Dehkordi, Z. K., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2015). Influence of personality on programming styles an empirical study. Journal of Information Technology Research, 8(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2015100103
    5. Diebold, P., Ostberg, J.-P., Wagner, S., & Zendler, U. (2015). What Do Practitioners Vary in Using Scrum? In C. Lassenius, T. Dingsøyr, & M. Paasivaara (Eds.), Agile processes, in software engineering, and extreme programming (Vol. 212, pp. 40–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_4
    6. Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Schekelmann, A., Tuzcu, A., Conte, T., Spinola, R., & Prikladnicki, R. (2015). Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering: Comparing Practices in Brazil and Germany. IEEE Software, 32(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2015.122
    7. Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). A Case Study on Artefact-Based RE Improvement in Practice. In P. Abrahamsson, L. Corral, M. Oivo, & B. Russo (Eds.), Product-focused software process improvement (Vol. 9459, pp. 114–130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_9
    8. Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). Naming the pain in requirements engineering: A design for a global family of surveys and first results from Germany. Information & Software Technology, 57, 616–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.05.008
    9. Janke, E., Brune, P., & Wagner, S. (2015). Does outside-in teaching improve the learning of object-oriented programming? In A. Bertolino, G. Canfora, & S. G. Elbaum (Eds.), 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 408–417). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2015.173
    10. Kalinowski, M., Spínola, R. O., Conte, T., Prikladnicki, R., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). Towards building knowledge on causes of critical requirements engineering problems. In H. Xu (Ed.), Proceedings, SEKE 2015, the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (pp. 1–6). KSI Research Inc. and Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/seke/seke2015.html#KalinowskiSCPF015
    11. Vetro, A., Ognawala, S., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2015). Fast feedback cycles in empirical software engineering research. In A. Bertolino, G. Canfora, & S. G. Elbaum (Eds.), 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2015) (pp. 583–586). IEEE Computer Society. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2015-2.html#VetroOF015
    12. Wagner, S. (2015). Continuous and Focused Developer Feedback on Software Quality (CoFoDeF). Research Ideas and Outcomes, 1, e7576. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7576
    13. Wagner, S., Goeb, A., Heinemann, L., Kläs, M., Lampasona, C., Lochmann, K., Mayr, A., Plösch, R., Seidl, A., Streit, J., & Trendowicz, A. (2015). Operationalised product quality models and assessment: The Quamoco approach. Information & Software Technology, 62, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.009
    14. Wagner, S., & Méndez Fernández, D. (2015). Analyzing text in software projects. In C. Bird, T. Menzies, & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), The art and science of analyzing software data. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411519-4.00003-3
    15. Wagner, S., Pflüger, D., & Mehl, M. (2015). Simulation software engineering: experiences and challenges. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Software Engineering for High Performance Computing in Computational Science and Engineering, SE-HPCCSE@SC 2015, 1–4. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/sc/sehpccse2015.html#WagnerPM15
  10. 2014

    1. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2014). A Software Safety Verification Method Based on System-Theoretic Process Analysis. In A. Bondavalli, A. Ceccarelli, & F. Ortmeier (Eds.), Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security - SAFECOMP 2014 Workshops: ASCoMS, DECSoS, DEVVARTS, ISSE, ReSA4CI, SASSUR (Vol. 8696, pp. 401–412). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/safecomp/safecomp2014w.html#AbdulkhaleqW14
    2. Fernández, D. M., Ognawala, S., Wagner, S., & Daneva, M. (2014). Where do we stand in requirements engineering improvement today?: first results from a mapping study. In M. Morisio, T. Dybå, & M. Torchiano (Eds.), 2014 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM ’14 (pp. 58:1-58:4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652555
    3. Gleirscher, M., Golubitskiy, D., Irlbeck, M., & Wagner, S. (2014). Introduction of static quality analysis in small- and medium-sized software enterprises: experiences from technology transfer. Software Quality Journal, 22(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-013-9217-z
    4. Wagner, S. (2014). Scrum for cyber-physical systems: a process proposal. In M. Tichy, J. Bosch, M. Goedicke, & M. Larsson (Eds.), 1st International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering, RCoSE 2014 (pp. 51–56). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593812.2593819
    5. Wagner, S. (2014). Software-Produktqualität modellieren und bewerten: Der Quamoco-Ansatz. In W. Hasselbring & N. C. Ehmke (Eds.), Software Engineering (Vol. 227, pp. 69–70). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2014.html#Wagner14
    6. The 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’14, Torino, Italy, September 17, 2014. (2014). In S. Wagner & M. D. Penta (Eds.), The 10th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’14, Torino, Italy, September 17, 2014. ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/promise/promise2014.html
  11. 2013

    1. Abdulkhaleq, A., & Wagner, S. (2013). Integrating State Machine Analysis with System-Theoretic Process Analysis. In S. Wagner & H. Lichter (Eds.), Software Engineering (Workshops) (Vol. 215, pp. 501–514). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2013w.html#AbdulkhaleqW13
    2. Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2013). Naming the pain in requirements engineering: design of a global family of surveys and first results from Germany. In F. Q. B. da Silva, N. J. Juzgado, & G. H. Travassos (Eds.), 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE ’13 (pp. 183–194). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460999.2461027
    3. Lochmann, K., Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2013). Are comprehensive quality models necessary for evaluating software quality? In B. Turhan (Ed.), 9th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’13 (pp. 3:1-3:9). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/promise/promise2013.html#LochmannRW13
    4. Ostberg, J.-P., Ramadani, J., & Wagner, S. (2013). A novel approach for discovering barriers in using automatic static analysis. In F. Q. B. da Silva, N. J. Juzgado, & G. H. Travassos (Eds.), 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE ’13 (pp. 78–81). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ease/ease2013.html#OstbergRW13
    5. Wagner, S. (2013). Making Software Quality Visible. In J. Heidrich, M. Oivo, A. Jedlitschka, & M. T. Baldassarre (Eds.), Product-Focused Software Process Improvement - 14th International Conference, PROFES 2013 (Vol. 7983, pp. 1–2). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/profes/profes2013.html#Wagner13
    6. Wagner, S. (2013). Software Product Quality Control (pp. I–XII, 1–210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38571-1
    7. Software Engineering 2013 - Workshopband (inkl. Doktorandensymposium), Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, 26. Februar - 1. März 2013 in Aachen. (2013). In S. Wagner & H. Lichter (Eds.), Software Engineering 2013 - Workshopband (inkl. Doktorandensymposium), Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, 26. Februar - 1. März 2013 in Aachen (Vol. 215). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2013w.html
  12. 2012

    1. Deissenboeck, F., Heinemann, L., Hummel, B., & Wagner, S. (2012). Challenges of the Dynamic Detection of Functionally Similar Code Fragments. In T. Mens, A. Cleve, & R. Ferenc (Eds.), 16th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR 2012 (pp. 299–308). IEEE Computer Society. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/csmr/csmr2012.html#DeissenboeckHHW12
    2. Gleirscher, M., Golubitskiy, D., Irlbeck, M., & Wagner, S. (2012). On the Benefit of Automated Static Analysis for Small and Medium-Sized Software Enterprises. In S. Biffl, D. Winkler, & J. Bergsmann (Eds.), Software Quality. Process Automation in Software Development - 4th International Conference, SWQD 2012 (Vol. 94, pp. 14–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27213-4_3
    3. Lochmann, K., Fernández, D. M., & Wagner, S. (2012). A Case Study on Specifying Quality Requirements Using a Quality Model. In K. R. P. H. Leung & P. Muenchaisri (Eds.), 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC 2012 (pp. 577–582). IEEE. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/apsec/apsec2012.html#LochmannFW12
    4. Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2012). Do we stop learning from our mistakes when using automatic code analysis tools?: an experiment proposal. In A. Begel & C. Sadowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on User Evaluation for Software Engineering Researchers, USER ’12 (pp. 21–24). IEEE. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/user2012.html#Ostberg012
    5. Ostberg, J.-P., & Wagner, S. (2012). Get started imminently: Using tutorials to accelerate learning in automated static analysis. In A. V. Jones (Ed.), 2012 Imperial College Computing Student Workshop, ICCSW 2012 (Vol. 28, pp. 109–115). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iccsw/iccsw2012.html#OstbergW12
    6. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’12, Lund, Sweden, September 21-22, 2012. (2012). In S. Wagner (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE ’12, Lund, Sweden, September 21-22, 2012. ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/promise/promise2012.html
    7. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Heinemann, L., Kläs, M., Trendowicz, A., Plösch, R., Seidl, A., Goeb, A., & Streit, J. (2012). The Quamoco product quality modelling and assessment approach. In M. Glinz, G. C. Murphy, & M. Pezzè (Eds.), 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2012 (pp. 1133–1142). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227106
  13. 2011

    1. Deissenboeck, F., Heinemann, L., Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Lochmann, K., & Wagner, S. (2011). The quamoco tool chain for quality modeling and assessment. In R. N. Taylor, H. C. Gall, & N. Medvidovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2011 (pp. 1007–1009). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2011.html#DeissenboeckHHLW11
    2. Méndez Fernández, D., Lochmann, K., Penzenstadler, B., & Wagner, S. (2011). A Case Study on the Application of an Artefact-Based Requirements Engineering Approach. 15th Annual Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2011.0013
    3. Pehmöller, A., Salger, F., & Wagner, S. (2011). Testing in Global Software Development – A Pattern Approach. Proc. 5th World Congress for Software Quality.
    4. Wagner, S. (2011). The use of application scanners in software product quality assessment. In S. Wagner, S. Chulani, & B. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ESEC/FSE 2011 (pp. 42–49). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2024587.2024597
    5. Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ESEC/FSE 2011, Szeged, Hungary, September 4, 2011. (2011). In S. Wagner, S. Chulani, & B. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ESEC/FSE 2011, Szeged, Hungary, September 4, 2011. ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/sigsoft/wosq2011.html
  14. 2010

    1. Fernández, D. M., Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., & Baumann, A. (2010). Field Study on Requirments Engineering Artefacts and Patterns. In M. Turner & M. Niazi (Eds.), 14th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2010. BCS. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ease/ease2010.html#Fernandez0LB10
    2. Islam, S., Mouratidis, H., & Wagner, S. (2010). Towards a Framework to Elicit and Manage Security and Privacy Requirements from Laws and Regulations. In R. Wieringa & A. Persson (Eds.), Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, 16th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2010 (Vol. 6182, pp. 255–261). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/refsq/refsq2010.html#IslamMW10
    3. Jürgens, E., Deissenboeck, F., Feilkas, M., Hummel, B., Schätz, B., Wagner, S., Domann, C., & Streit, J. (2010). Can clone detection support quality assessments of requirements specifications? In J. Kramer, J. Bishop, P. T. Devanbu, & S. Uchitel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2, ICSE 2010 (pp. 79–88). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/icse2010-2.html#JurgensDFHSWDS10
    4. Lochmann, K., Wagner, S., Goeb, A., & Kirchler, D. (2010). Classification of Software Quality Patterns. Tagungsband Des 3. Workshops Zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung Und -Bewertung (SQMB ’10).
    5. Luckey, M., Baumann, A., Méndez Fernández, D., & Wagner, S. (2010). Reusing security requirements using an extended quality model. In S.-W. Lee, M. Monga, & J. Jürjens (Eds.), ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems, SESS 2010 (pp. 1–7). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/sess2010.html#LuckeyBFW10
    6. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deißenböck, F., Kläs, M., Liggesmeyer, P., Münch, J., & Streit, J. (2010). Softwarequalitätsmodelle - Praxisempfehlungen und Forschungsagenda. Informatik Spektrum, 33(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00287-009-0339-4
    7. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Liggesmeyer, P., & Münch, J. (Eds.). (2010). Tagungsband des 3. Workshops zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB ’10). Technische Universität München.
    8. Wagner, S., Schätz, B., Puchner, S., & Kock, P. (2010). A Case Study on Safety Cases in the Automotive Domain: Modules, Patterns, and Models. IEEE 21st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE 2010, 269–278. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/issre/issre2010.html#WagnerSPK10
  15. 2009

    1. Braun, P., Philipps, J., Schätz, B., & Wagner, S. (2009). Model-Based Safety-Cases for Software-Intensive Systems. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 238(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2009.09.007
    2. Deissenboeck, F., Jürgens, E., Lochmann, K., & Wagner, S. (2009). Software quality models: Purposes, usage scenarios and requirements. 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Quality, WoSQ@ICSE 2009, 9–14. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icse/wosq2009.html#DeissenboeckJL009
    3. Jürgens, E., Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., & Wagner, S. (2009). Do code clones matter? 31st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’09), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070547
    4. Wagner, S., & Islam, S. (2009). Modellierung von Software-Security mit aktivitätenbasierten Qualitätsmodellen. Tagungsband 2. Workshop Zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung Und -Bewertung (SQMB ’09).
    5. Wagner, S., Méndez Fernández, D., Islam, S., & Lochmann, K. (2009). A Security Requirements Approach for Web Systems. Proc. Workshop Quality Assessment in Web (QAW 2009).
    6. Wagner, S. (2009). A Bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality models. In T. J. Ostrand (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Predictive Models in Software Engineering, PROMISE 2009 (p. 6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1540438.1540447
    7. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Liggesmeyer, P., & Münch, J. (Eds.). (2009). Tagungsband 2. Workshop zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB ’09). Technische Universität München.
    8. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Winter, S., Goeb, A., & Klaes, M. (2009). Quality models in practice: A preliminary analysis. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2009, 464–467. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/esem/esem2009.html#WagnerLWGK09
  16. 2008

    1. Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., Jürgens, E., Schätz, B., Wagner, S., Girard, J.-F., & Teuchert, S. (2008). Clone detection in automotive model-based development. In H. Giese, M. Huhn, U. Nickel, & B. Schätz (Eds.), Dagstuhl-Workshop MBEES: Modellbasierte Entwicklung eingebetteter Systeme IV (Vols. 2008–2, pp. 57–67). TU Braunschweig, Institut für Software Systems Engineering. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/mbees/mbees2008.html#DeissenboeckHJSWGT08
    2. Deissenboeck, F., Jürgens, E., Hummel, B., Wagner, S., y Parareda, B. M., & Pizka, M. (2008). Tool Support for Continuous Quality Control. IEEE Software, 25(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2008.129
    3. Pfaller, C., Wagner, S., Gericke, J., & Wiemann, M. (2008). Multi-Dimensional Measures for Test Case Quality. First International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation, ICST 2008, Lillehammer, Norway, April 9-11, 2008, Workshops Proceedings, 364–368. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icst/icstw2008.html#PfallerWGW08
    4. Ruhe, M., & Wagner, S. (2008). Using the ProdFlow(TM) approach to address the myth of productivity in r&d organizations. In H. D. Rombach, S. G. Elbaum, & J. Münch (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2008 (pp. 339–341). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/esem/esem2008.html#RuheW08
    5. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., Teuchert, S., & Girard, J.-F. (2008). Assuring Maintainability in Model-Driven Development of Embedded Systems. In J. Rech & C. Bunse (Eds.), Model-Driven Software Development: Integrating Quality Assurance. Information Science Reference.
    6. Wagner, S. (2008). Defect classification and defect types revisited. In P. T. Devanbu, B. Murphy, N. Nagappan, & T. Zimmermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on Defects in Large Software Systems, held in conjunction with the ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 2008), DEFECTS 2008 (pp. 39–40). ACM. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/issta/defects2008.html#Wagner08
    7. Wagner, S., Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Münch, J., & Liggesmeyer, P. (Eds.). (2008). Workshop-Band Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB ’08). Technische Universität München.
    8. Wagner, S., Deißenböck, F., Feilkas, M., & Jürgens, E. (2008). Software-Qualitätsmodelle in der Praxis: Erfahrungen mit aktivitätenbasierten Modellen. Workshop-Band Software-Qualitätsmodellierung Und -Bewertung (SQMB ’08).
    9. Wagner, S., & Deissenboeck, F. (2008). Abstractness, Specificity, and Complexity in Software Design. Proceedings of the 2Nd International Workshop on The Role of Abstraction in Software Engineering, 35--42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1370164.1370173
    10. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., Aichner, M., Wimmer, J., & Schwalb, M. (2008). An Evaluation of Two Bug Pattern Tools for Java. First International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation, ICST 2008, 248–257. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icst/icst2008.html#WagnerDAWS08
    11. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., & Winter, S. (2008). Managing quality requirements using activity-based quality models. In B. Wong (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software quality, WoSQ@ICSE 2008 (pp. 29–34). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1370099.1370107
    12. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., & Winter, S. (2008). Erfassung, Strukturierung und Überprüfung von Qualitätsanforderungen durch aktivitätenbasierte Qualitätsmodelle. In W. Maalej & B. Brügge (Eds.), Software Engineering (Workshops) (Vol. 122, pp. 464–469). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2008w.html#WagnerDW08
    13. Wagner, S., & Ruhe, M. (2008). A Systematic Review of Productivity Factors in Software Development. Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Software Productivity Analysis and Cost Estimation (SPACE 2008).
    14. Wagner, S., & Ruhe, M. (2008). Using a Bayesian Network in the ProdFLOWTM Approach. Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Software Productivity Analysis and Cost Estimation (SPACE 2008).
  17. 2007

    1. Deissenboeck, F., Wagner, S., & Pizka, M. (2007). Kosten-basierte Klassifikation von Qualitätsanforderungen. Erhebung, Spezifikation Und Analyse Nichtfunktionaler Anforderungen in Der Systementwicklung.
    2. Deissenboeck, F., Wagner, S., Pizka, M., Teuchert, S., & Girard, J.-F. (2007). An Activity-Based Quality Model for Maintainability. 23rd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2007), 184–193. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icsm/icsm2007.html#DeissenboeckWPTG07
  • Most of the basic courses on software engineering
  • Advanced software testing and analysis
  • Scientific methods for computer science
  • Research methods for software engineering
  • Leading and coaching software projects
  • Software engineering for AI-based systems
  • Software system safety

Stefan Wagner studied computer science in Augsburg and Edinburgh. He holds a PhD from the Technical University of Munich. He is the author of more than 130 peer-reviewed scientific articles and the book "Software Product Quality Control". He is Section Editor of PeerJ Computer Science and member of the editorial boards of IEEE Software, MDPI Computer, MDPI Software, Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development and Research Ideas and Outcomes. His research interests include various aspects of software and systems engineering including software quality, human aspects, automotive software, AI-based systems and empirical studies. He is member of the German GI and senior member of ACM and IEEE.

Current Projects

  • Framework for the design & integration of AI components (AISA)
  • Efficient testing of AI-based control (AISA)
  • Visual analytics for MLOps (AISA)
  • Automated generation of system-level test programs for characterization of parametric device properties (GS IMTR)
  • Software test suite optimisation for complex high data-volume software (GS IMTR)
  • Bringing artificial intelligence into vocational training (KI B3)
  • Software development of upgradeable vehicles (SWUPCar) in the Innovation Campus Future Mobility (ICM)
  • Integrated AI in Teaching at the University of Stuttgart (IKILeUS)
  • Software Campus Microservices
  • iDevOps Microservice Migration (with Siemens AG)

Finished Projects

  • Criticalmate (funded by BMBF)
  • Doctoral Programme Services Computing (in collaboration with Reutlingen University, funded by the MWK Baden-Württemberg)
  • Safey of Fail-Operational Systems (with BMW AG)
  • System-Theoretic Analysis of Dependable Systems in the Automotive Domain (MISTI Global Seed Fund, Collaboration with Prof. Nancy Leveson)
  • Privacy in Stream Processing (Patron) (funded by Baden-Württemberg Stiftung)
  • Hazard Analysis of Highly Automated Vehicle Functions (Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG)
  • Application of STPA to the Daimler Environment (Daimler AG)
  • Experimentelle Verbesserung des Lernens von Software Engineering, EVELIN (Subcontractor of HS Neu-ULM, funded by the BMBF)
  • Software-Qualität: Flexible Modellierung und integriertes Controlling, QuaMoCo (TU München with Capgemini sd&m, SAP, Siemens, itestra, Fraunhofer IESE, funded by the BMBF)
  • MAN-TUM Maintenance, MANTUMa (TU München with MAN Nutzfahrzeuge)
  • Productivity - Balance for Excellence (TU München with Siemens CT)
  • Google Research Award, SimDect (TU München with Google)
  • Anforderungsorientiertes, modellbasiertes Testen, AMT (TU München with Siemens CT)
  • Models for System Integration Testing, MoSIT (TU München with T-Systems)
  • Product Quality for Software-intensive Products, PQSP (TU München with Siemens CT)
  • Methodical founded development of real-time systems, InTime (TU München funded by the DFG)
  • FAct-based Maturity through Institutionalisation Lessons-learned and Involved Exploration of System-family engineering, FAMILIES (TU München with Siemens CT)
  • Siemens Quality Model (TU München with Siemens COM)
  • From Concepts to Application in System-Family Engineering, CAFE (TU München with Siemens CT)
  • AutoFocus Model and Model-Based Testing of the MOST Network Master (TU München with BMW)
  • Cross-Species Anatomy Network, XSPAN (Heriot-Watt UniversityUniversity of Edinburgh, funded by the BBSRC)
To the top of the page